Skip to content

[ci] Updated commit hash for re-usable workflows in openwisp-utils - #802

Merged
pandafy merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
update-workflow-action-pins
Oct 23, 2026
Merged

pandafy merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
update-workflow-action-pins

Conversation

@pandafy

@pandafy pandafy commented Oct 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Checklist

Reference to Existing Issue

N/A

Description of Changes

Updated commit hash for re-usable workflows in openwisp-utils

Screenshot

N/A

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Organization UI
  • Review profile: ASSERTIVE
  • Plan: Essentials
  • Run ID: 994dddd1-2d97-4772-b0ef-2771b3cab298
📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0bd0c31 and a1ce5a0.

📒 Files selected for processing: 3
  • .github/workflows/bot-changelog-runner.yml
  • .github/workflows/bot-ci-failure.yml
  • .github/workflows/version-branch.yml

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. 1 included review remains after this review. Your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 4 reviews per hour.

📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout: 14
  • GitHub Check: Python==3.11 | django~=5.1.0
  • GitHub Check: Python==3.10 | django~=5.1.0
  • GitHub Check: Python==3.12 | django~=5.0.0
  • GitHub Check: Python==3.10 | django~=4.2.0
  • GitHub Check: Python==3.12 | django~=5.1.0
  • GitHub Check: Python==3.13 | django~=5.2.0
  • GitHub Check: Python==3.11 | django~=4.2.0
  • GitHub Check: Python==3.11 | django~=5.2.0
  • GitHub Check: Python==3.10 | django~=5.2.0
  • GitHub Check: Python==3.12 | django~=4.2.0
  • GitHub Check: Python==3.13 | django~=5.1.0
  • GitHub Check: Python==3.12 | django~=5.2.0
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions: 1
Do not complain about dependencies installed from controlled mutable OpenWISP branches.

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

Files:

  • .github/workflows/version-branch.yml
  • .github/workflows/bot-ci-failure.yml
  • .github/workflows/bot-changelog-runner.yml
🪛 GitHub Check: zizmor
.github/workflows/version-branch.yml

[notice] 14-14:
commit hash does not point to a Git tag: this job

.github/workflows/bot-ci-failure.yml

[notice] 80-80:
commit hash does not point to a Git tag: this job

.github/workflows/bot-changelog-runner.yml

[notice] 76-76:
commit hash does not point to a Git tag: this job

🔇 Additional comments: 3
.github/workflows/bot-changelog-runner.yml: 1

76-76: LGTM!

.github/workflows/bot-ci-failure.yml: 1

80-80: LGTM!

.github/workflows/version-branch.yml: 1

14-14: LGTM!

📝 Walkthrough

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Change: Other

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to a1ce5

The workflow pin updates are mergeable with no identified current-head risk.

Pre-merge checks: Passed 5
Check name Status Explanation
Title check Passed The title uses the required [ci] prefix and clearly describes the commit hash update for reusable workflows.
Description check Passed The description includes all required sections, records manual testing, and marks tests and documentation as not applicable for this workflow-only change.
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Ui Changes, Regression Test, Docs Passed The pull request changes only three GitHub Actions workflow references from one reusable-workflow commit hash to another. It introduces no end-user UI change, application-code change, or new documente…
Full details: Ui Changes, Regression Test, Docs

Explanation

The pull request changes only three GitHub Actions workflow references from one reusable-workflow commit hash to another. It introduces no end-user UI change, application-code change, or new documented feature. The regression-test requirement explicitly exempts CI changes, and screenshots and documentation updates are not required.

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

permissions:
contents: read
uses: openwisp/openwisp-utils/.github/workflows/reusable-bot-changelog.yml@3497e3fbd42dff2a59f566184a1bf8e1b2ab57ea # master
uses: openwisp/openwisp-utils/.github/workflows/reusable-bot-changelog.yml@0bd0c3190d6081ec776baa96d73d8a8a3e059a73 # master
permissions:
contents: read
uses: openwisp/openwisp-utils/.github/workflows/reusable-bot-ci-failure.yml@3497e3fbd42dff2a59f566184a1bf8e1b2ab57ea # master
uses: openwisp/openwisp-utils/.github/workflows/reusable-bot-ci-failure.yml@0bd0c3190d6081ec776baa96d73d8a8a3e059a73 # master
version-branch:
if: github.repository == 'openwisp/openwisp-utils'
uses: openwisp/openwisp-utils/.github/workflows/reusable-version-branch.yml@3497e3fbd42dff2a59f566184a1bf8e1b2ab57ea # master
uses: openwisp/openwisp-utils/.github/workflows/reusable-version-branch.yml@0bd0c3190d6081ec776baa96d73d8a8a3e059a73 # master
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from To do (general) to In progress in OpenWISP Contributor's Board Oct 23, 2026
@pandafy
pandafy merged commit 72e73ae into master Oct 23, 2026
24 checks passed
@pandafy
pandafy deleted the update-workflow-action-pins branch October 23, 2026 20:55
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from In progress to Done in OpenWISP Contributor's Board Oct 23, 2026
@coveralls

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

coverage: 97.66% (+0.02%) from 97.639% — update-workflow-action-pins into master

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants