-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update access modifiers for CPU impls #28286
Open
WeldonWangwang
wants to merge
3
commits into
openvinotoolkit:master
Choose a base branch
from
WeldonWangwang:wangwang/fix_reorder_result_with_cl_mem
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+12
−9
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ struct gpu_buffer : public lockable_gpu_mem, public memory { | |||
assert(0 == _lock_count); | ||||
return _buffer; | ||||
} | ||||
void* buffer_ptr() const override { | ||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I believe it's not needed? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hi Sergey, it's not needed, this API just used in debug messages here:
The ptr would be 0 without this API, so I added it. such as: GPU_Debug: sync_infer_request.cpp:989:prepare_output: result:Result_51154 with index 9 prepare output: 0
|
||||
return get_buffer().get(); | ||||
} | ||||
|
||||
event::ptr copy_from(stream& stream, const void* data_ptr, size_t src_offset, size_t dst_offset, size_t size, bool blocking) override; | ||||
event::ptr copy_from(stream& stream, const memory& src_mem, size_t src_offset, size_t dst_offset, size_t size, bool blocking) override; | ||||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
output memory will be updated as the reason solved by this PR, could you descript the detail reason?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
who allocate cl_mem output for this node? and why cpu impl is choosen?
btw, this line will break if output is usm_device, it's unsafe to directly change to read_write here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, River, I will add some test case to explain this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it is usm_device, it will do copying operation by mem_lock itself, right? But we need logic to write back to usm_device memory if needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@WeldonWangwang, could you please update access modifiers for the other CPU impls as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sshlyapn Sure, will add it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the memory is used for readonly, why change them to read_write?