Skip to content

Conversation

@kyrtapz
Copy link
Contributor

@kyrtapz kyrtapz commented Oct 13, 2025

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 13, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 13, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 13, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kyrtapz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 13, 2025
@kyrtapz kyrtapz force-pushed the ds_handle_failed_cpic branch 2 times, most recently from 8c307fe to 6a7d141 Compare November 6, 2025 16:00
When a CPIC is created and the cloud controller externally sets its
status to Failed because the node no longer exists ovn-k should clean it up.

Reproducer:
1. CPIC assignment fails because the node was removed after the object was created
but before it was sucessfully assigned in cloud.
2. The EgressIP status never reflects it as it ignores non-sucessfull assignments
3. Later reconciliation attempts trying to create the same CPIC again
4. Creation failures due to "already exists" errors

To fix the issue remove failed CPICs during CPIC add reconciliation.

Signed-off-by: Patryk Diak <[email protected]>
@kyrtapz kyrtapz force-pushed the ds_handle_failed_cpic branch from 6a7d141 to d7aedb8 Compare November 7, 2025 12:10
In a scenario when during CPIC removal the EIP controller
wants to assign it again we were missing a reconciliation attempt
after the removal succeded.

Signed-off-by: Patryk Diak <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant