Skip to content

OCPBUGS-84491: Remove openshift-ingress terminationMessagePolicy exemption - #31435

Open
gcs278 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
gcs278:OCPBUGS-84491-remove-openshift-ingress-exemption
Open

OCPBUGS-84491: Remove openshift-ingress terminationMessagePolicy exemption#31435
gcs278 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
gcs278:OCPBUGS-84491-remove-openshift-ingress-exemption

Conversation

@gcs278

@gcs278 gcs278 commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Removes the openshift-ingress namespace exemption from the terminationMessagePolicy monitor test
  • The upstream fix (istio/istio#60102) adding terminationMessagePolicy=FallbackToLogsOnError to the istiod pilot container has been cherry-picked into downstream openshift-service-mesh/istio release-1.30.1 (commit 25c524c), fixing the pods/istiod-openshift-gateway violation
  • The Gateway API proxy containers (pods/gateway) were fixed in openshift/cluster-ingress-operator#1428
  • With both fixes in place, the exemption for openshift-ingress is no longer needed

Test plan

  • Verify CI passes without the exemption (the [sig-arch] all containers in ns/openshift-ingress must have terminationMessagePolicy=FallbackToLogsOnError test should now pass instead of flaking)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…ption

The upstream fix (istio/istio#60102) adding terminationMessagePolicy=
FallbackToLogsOnError to the istiod pilot container has been cherry-picked
into downstream openshift-service-mesh/istio release-1.30.1 (commit 25c524c).
This removes the openshift-ingress exemption from the monitor test since
the violation is now fixed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 27, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gcs278: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84491, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (5.0.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.0.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @melvinjoseph86

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

  • Removes the openshift-ingress namespace exemption from the terminationMessagePolicy monitor test
  • The upstream fix (istio/istio#60102) adding terminationMessagePolicy=FallbackToLogsOnError to the istiod pilot container has been cherry-picked into downstream openshift-service-mesh/istio release-1.30.1 (commit 25c524c), so the exemption for pods/gateway and pods/istiod-openshift-gateway is no longer needed

Test plan

  • Verify CI passes without the exemption (the [sig-arch] all containers in ns/openshift-ingress must have terminationMessagePolicy=FallbackToLogsOnError test should now pass instead of flaking)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested a review from melvinjoseph86 July 27, 2026 15:45
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

The termination message policy monitor removes the openshift-ingress exemption from its existing violations map, causing violations in that namespace to follow normal failure and flaking behavior.

Changes

Termination message policy monitoring

Layer / File(s) Summary
Remove ingress exemption
pkg/monitortests/clusterversionoperator/terminationmessagepolicy/monitortest.go
Removes openshift-ingress from existingViolations, so its containers are no longer grandfathered.
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) ~2 minutes
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15
✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed PR only removes an exemption map entry; it չի adds or edits any Ginkgo It/Describe/Context/When titles, so no unstable test names were introduced.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed PR only edits a monitor analyzer map; no Ginkgo specs, setup/cleanup, waits, or assertions were added/changed.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed This PR only removes an exemption in a monitor analyzer; it adds no new Ginkgo e2e test bodies or MicroShift-unsupported APIs/features.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed No new Ginkgo e2e tests were added; the only change is a monitor exemption removal in a non-Ginkgo collector file.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed Only a monitor-test exemption list changed; no deployment, controller, affinity, taint, or replica logic was added.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed Only the exemption map changed; no process-level code or stdout-writing APIs appear in the touched package.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed Not applicable: the changed file is a monitor analyzer, not a new Ginkgo e2e test, and it contains no IPv4 or external-connectivity assumptions.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed The only code change removes an openshift-ingress exemption; no weak-crypto, custom crypto, or secret-comparison code is present.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed Only a Go monitor-test file changed; no K8s/container manifests or privilege settings were added.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed The patch only removes a namespace exemption; it adds no new logging or sensitive fields beyond existing pod/container names in test failures.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely identifies the removal of the openshift-ingress terminationMessagePolicy exemption.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from deads2k and sjenning July 27, 2026 15:46
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the ready-for-human-review Indicates a PR has been reviewed by automated tools and is ready for human review label Jul 27, 2026
@gcs278

gcs278 commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I need to ensure it's fixed by running CI:
/pipeline required

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@openshift-trt

openshift-trt Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR.
Please ensure that new tests meet guidelines for naming and stability.

New Test Risks for sha: d329291

Job Name New Test Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-csi Medium - "External Storage [Driver: ebs.csi.aws.com] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (block volmode)] volume-modify [FeatureGate:VolumeAttributesClass] [Feature:VolumeAttributesClass] should recover from invalid target VAC by updating PVC to new valid VAC" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-csi Medium - "External Storage [Driver: ebs.csi.aws.com] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (default fs)] volume-modify [FeatureGate:VolumeAttributesClass] [Feature:VolumeAttributesClass] should recover from invalid target VAC by updating PVC to new valid VAC" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-csi Medium - "External Storage [Driver: ebs.csi.aws.com] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (xfs)] [Slow] volume-expand Verify if offline PVC expansion works" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-csi Medium - "External Storage [Driver: ebs.csi.aws.com] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (xfs)] [Slow] volume-expand should resize volume when PVC is edited and the pod is re-created on the same node after controller resize is finished" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-csi Medium - "External Storage [Driver: ebs.csi.aws.com] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (xfs)] [Slow] volume-expand should resize volume when PVC is edited while pod is using it" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-csi Medium - "External Storage [Driver: pd.csi.storage.gke.io] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (xfs)] [Slow] volume-expand Verify if offline PVC expansion works" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-csi Medium - "External Storage [Driver: pd.csi.storage.gke.io] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (xfs)] [Slow] volume-expand should resize volume when PVC is edited and the pod is re-created on the same node after controller resize is finished" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-csi Medium - "External Storage [Driver: pd.csi.storage.gke.io] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (xfs)] [Slow] volume-expand should resize volume when PVC is edited while pod is using it" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.

New tests seen in this PR at sha: d329291

  • "External Storage [Driver: ebs.csi.aws.com] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (block volmode)] volume-modify [FeatureGate:VolumeAttributesClass] [Feature:VolumeAttributesClass] should recover from invalid target VAC by updating PVC to new valid VAC" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
  • "External Storage [Driver: ebs.csi.aws.com] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (default fs)] volume-modify [FeatureGate:VolumeAttributesClass] [Feature:VolumeAttributesClass] should recover from invalid target VAC by updating PVC to new valid VAC" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
  • "External Storage [Driver: ebs.csi.aws.com] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (xfs)] [Slow] volume-expand Verify if offline PVC expansion works" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
  • "External Storage [Driver: ebs.csi.aws.com] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (xfs)] [Slow] volume-expand should resize volume when PVC is edited and the pod is re-created on the same node after controller resize is finished" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
  • "External Storage [Driver: ebs.csi.aws.com] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (xfs)] [Slow] volume-expand should resize volume when PVC is edited while pod is using it" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
  • "External Storage [Driver: pd.csi.storage.gke.io] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (xfs)] [Slow] volume-expand Verify if offline PVC expansion works" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
  • "External Storage [Driver: pd.csi.storage.gke.io] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (xfs)] [Slow] volume-expand should resize volume when PVC is edited and the pod is re-created on the same node after controller resize is finished" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
  • "External Storage [Driver: pd.csi.storage.gke.io] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (xfs)] [Slow] volume-expand should resize volume when PVC is edited while pod is using it" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]

@gcs278

gcs278 commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Whoops - I realized I need openshift/cluster-ingress-operator#1502 to merge first. We need to bump to istio 1.30 to get this fix.

/wip

@gcs278

gcs278 commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/wip

@gcs278 gcs278 changed the title OCPBUGS-84491: Remove openshift-ingress terminationMessagePolicy exemption [WIP] OCPBUGS-84491: Remove openshift-ingress terminationMessagePolicy exemption Jul 29, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 29, 2026
@gcs278

gcs278 commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

openshift/cluster-ingress-operator#1530 has merged
/retest

@gcs278

gcs278 commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest

@gcs278 gcs278 changed the title [WIP] OCPBUGS-84491: Remove openshift-ingress terminationMessagePolicy exemption OCPBUGS-84491: Remove openshift-ingress terminationMessagePolicy exemption Jul 31, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 31, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gcs278: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@gcs278

gcs278 commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@CodeRabbit which of my passing pre-submits validates that this flake/failure is gone? Can you confirm you do not see the terminationMessagePolicy failure or flake for openshift-ingress anywhere?

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo="openshift/origin"
pr="31435"

echo "== PR metadata =="
gh pr view "$pr" --repo "$repo" --json headRefOid,updatedAt,statusCheckRollup \
  --jq '{headRefOid, updatedAt, checks: [.statusCheckRollup[] | {name: .name, status: .status, conclusion: .conclusion, detailsUrl: .detailsUrl}]}'

sha="$(gh pr view "$pr" --repo "$repo" --json headRefOid --jq .headRefOid)"
echo
echo "== Check runs for ${sha} =="
gh api "repos/${repo}/commits/${sha}/check-runs?per_page=100" \
  --jq '.check_runs[] | [.name, .status, .conclusion, .details_url, .output.title, .output.summary] | `@tsv`'

Length of output: 2340


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo="openshift/origin"
pr="31435"
sha="d329291cd11881c9852ee3ebd4ca87d1aedf06ed"

echo "== Combined commit status =="
gh api "repos/${repo}/commits/${sha}/status" \
  --jq '{state, total_count, statuses: [.statuses[] | {context, state, target_url, description, updated_at}]}'

echo
echo "== PR comments containing CI or job links =="
gh api "repos/${repo}/issues/${pr}/comments?per_page=100" --paginate \
  --jq '.[] | select(.body | test("(?i)(prow|ci\\.openshift|testgrid|job|retest|verify)")) | {created_at, user: .user.login, body}'

Length of output: 17049


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo="openshift/origin"
sha="d329291cd11881c9852ee3ebd4ca87d1aedf06ed"
bucket="test-platform-results"

# Get every successful e2e Prow job path from legacy GitHub statuses.
mapfile -t job_prefixes < <(
  gh api "repos/${repo}/commits/${sha}/status" --jq '
    .statuses[]
    | select(.state == "success" and (.context | startswith("ci/prow/e2e-")))
    | .target_url
    | capture("/view/gs/(?<bucket>[^/]+)/(?<prefix>.+)$").prefix
  '
)

echo "== Successful e2e jobs =="
printf '%s\n' "${job_prefixes[@]}"

tmpdir="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmpdir"' EXIT

for prefix in "${job_prefixes[@]}"; do
  echo
  echo "== Artifacts: ${prefix} =="

  encoded_prefix="$(python3 -c 'import sys, urllib.parse; print(urllib.parse.quote(sys.argv[1], safe=""))' "$prefix/")"
  curl -fsSL "https://storage.googleapis.com/storage/v1/b/${bucket}/o?prefix=${encoded_prefix}&maxResults=1000" \
    > "${tmpdir}/objects.json" || {
      echo "Could not list public artifacts for this job."
      continue
    }

  # Print candidate result files and download only manageable textual/JUnit artifacts.
  jq -r '.items[]? | [.name, (.size|tonumber)] | `@tsv`' "${tmpdir}/objects.json" |
    grep -Ei '(^|/)(junit|.*\.xml$|.*\.txt$|.*\.json$|.*\.log$|monitor)' |
    head -n 100

  while IFS=$'\t' read -r object size; do
    case "$object" in
      *junit*|*.xml|*monitor*|*events*.json|*events*.txt)
        if [ "$size" -le 25000000 ]; then
          encoded_object="$(python3 -c 'import sys, urllib.parse; print(urllib.parse.quote(sys.argv[1], safe=""))' "$object")"
          curl -fsSL "https://storage.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/${bucket}/o/${encoded_object}?alt=media" \
            -o "${tmpdir}/artifact" || continue
          matches="$(grep -ainE 'terminationMessagePolicy|FallbackToLogsOnError|openshift-ingress|all containers in ns/' "${tmpdir}/artifact" || true)"
          if [ -n "$matches" ]; then
            echo "-- Matches in ${object} --"
            printf '%s\n' "$matches"
          fi
        fi
        ;;
    esac
  done < <(jq -r '.items[]? | [.name, (.size|tonumber)] | `@tsv`' "${tmpdir}/objects.json")
done

Length of output: 2514


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo="openshift/origin"
sha="d329291cd11881c9852ee3ebd4ca87d1aedf06ed"
bucket="test-platform-results"
tmpdir="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmpdir"' EXIT

gh api "repos/${repo}/commits/${sha}/status" --jq '
  .statuses[]
  | select(.state == "success" and (.context | startswith("ci/prow/e2e-")))
  | [.context, (.target_url | capture("/view/gs/[^/]+/(?<prefix>.+)$").prefix)]
  | `@tsv`
' > "${tmpdir}/jobs.tsv"

echo "== Successful e2e jobs =="
cat "${tmpdir}/jobs.tsv"

while IFS=$'\t' read -r context prefix; do
  echo
  echo "== ${context}: ${prefix} =="

  encoded_prefix="$(python3 -c 'import sys, urllib.parse; print(urllib.parse.quote(sys.argv[1], safe=""))' "${prefix}/")"
  if ! curl -fsSL "https://storage.googleapis.com/storage/v1/b/${bucket}/o?prefix=${encoded_prefix}&maxResults=1000" \
      > "${tmpdir}/objects.json"; then
    echo "Could not list public artifacts for this job."
    continue
  fi

  jq -r '.items[]? | [.name, (.size|tonumber)] | `@tsv`' "${tmpdir}/objects.json" > "${tmpdir}/object-list.tsv"

  echo "-- Candidate result artifacts --"
  grep -Ei '(^|/)(junit|.*\.xml$|.*events.*\.(json|txt)$|.*monitor.*|.*summary.*\.(json|txt)$)' \
    "${tmpdir}/object-list.tsv" | head -n 100 || true

  while IFS=$'\t' read -r object size; do
    case "$object" in
      *junit*|*.xml|*monitor*|*events*.json|*events*.txt|*summary*.json|*summary*.txt)
        if [ "$size" -le 25000000 ]; then
          encoded_object="$(python3 -c 'import sys, urllib.parse; print(urllib.parse.quote(sys.argv[1], safe=""))' "$object")"
          if curl -fsSL "https://storage.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/${bucket}/o/${encoded_object}?alt=media" \
              -o "${tmpdir}/artifact"; then
            grep -ainE 'terminationMessagePolicy|FallbackToLogsOnError|openshift-ingress|all containers in ns/' \
              "${tmpdir}/artifact" \
              && echo "-- End matches: ${object} --" \
              || true
          fi
        fi
        ;;
    esac
  done < "${tmpdir}/object-list.tsv"
done < "${tmpdir}/jobs.tsv"

Length of output: 2153


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

owner="openshift"
repo="origin"
sha="d329291cd11881c9852ee3ebd4ca87d1aedf06ed"
bucket="test-platform-results"
tmpdir="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmpdir"' EXIT

curl -fsSL \
  -H 'Accept: application/vnd.github+json' \
  "https://api.github.com/repos/${owner}/${repo}/commits/${sha}/status" \
  > "${tmpdir}/statuses.json"

jq -r '
  .statuses[]
  | select(.state == "success" and (.context | startswith("ci/prow/e2e-")))
  | [.context, (.target_url | capture("/view/gs/[^/]+/(?<prefix>.+)$").prefix)]
  | `@tsv`
' "${tmpdir}/statuses.json" > "${tmpdir}/jobs.tsv"

echo "== Successful e2e jobs =="
cat "${tmpdir}/jobs.tsv"

while IFS=$'\t' read -r context prefix; do
  echo
  echo "== ${context} =="

  encoded_prefix="$(python3 -c 'import sys, urllib.parse; print(urllib.parse.quote(sys.argv[1], safe=""))' "${prefix}/")"
  curl -fsSL \
    "https://storage.googleapis.com/storage/v1/b/${bucket}/o?prefix=${encoded_prefix}&maxResults=1000" \
    > "${tmpdir}/objects.json"

  jq -r '.items[]? | [.name, (.size|tonumber)] | `@tsv`' "${tmpdir}/objects.json" \
    > "${tmpdir}/objects.tsv"

  found=0
  while IFS=$'\t' read -r object size; do
    case "$object" in
      *junit*|*.xml|*monitor*|*events*.json|*events*.txt|*summary*.json|*summary*.txt)
        if [ "$size" -le 25000000 ]; then
          encoded_object="$(python3 -c 'import sys, urllib.parse; print(urllib.parse.quote(sys.argv[1], safe=""))' "$object")"
          curl -fsSL \
            "https://storage.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/${bucket}/o/${encoded_object}?alt=media" \
            -o "${tmpdir}/artifact" || continue
          if grep -ainE 'terminationMessagePolicy|FallbackToLogsOnError|openshift-ingress|all containers in ns/' \
              "${tmpdir}/artifact"; then
            echo "-- Artifact: ${object} --"
            found=1
          fi
        fi
        ;;
    esac
  done < "${tmpdir}/objects.tsv"

  if [ "$found" -eq 0 ]; then
    echo "No matching text found in JUnit or monitor artifacts that were available and under 25 MB."
  fi
done < "${tmpdir}/jobs.tsv"

Length of output: 2171


@gcs278, the relevant passing pre-submits are the e2e-* jobs. The strongest validation after cluster-ingress-operator#1530 merged is:

  • ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips

These jobs passed. The earlier successful e2e-* jobs also passed.

The go-verify-deps, lint, unit, verify-deps, image, and verify jobs do not validate this installed-cluster monitor.

I cannot confirm the exact absence of the terminationMessagePolicy failure or flake. The artifact query failed before it ran because the sandbox reported repository setup failure twice, including with cloning disabled. Please retry the artifact query or inspect the linked Prow artifacts. The required evidence is a passing result for:

[sig-arch] all containers in ns/openshift-ingress must have terminationMessagePolicy=FallbackToLogsOnError

No available output showed this test result or a related failure/flake.

You are interacting with an AI system.

@gcs278

gcs278 commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I've confirmed manually that this is passing: : [Monitor:termination-message-policy][sig-arch] all containers in ns/openshift-ingress must have terminationMessagePolicy=FallbackToLogsOnError in both of the serial jobs

/verified by CI

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Jul 31, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gcs278: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

I've confirmed manually that this is passing: : [Monitor:termination-message-policy][sig-arch] all containers in ns/openshift-ingress must have terminationMessagePolicy=FallbackToLogsOnError in both of the serial jobs

/verified by CI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@gcs278

gcs278 commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I saw failures on a recent hypershift job - I don't think istio 1.30 has made it into a CI/Nightly stream yet, I'm going to wait until that happens before merging this:
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 31, 2026
@bentito

bentito commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 31, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bentito, gcs278
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign miyadav for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ready-for-human-review Indicates a PR has been reviewed by automated tools and is ready for human review verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants