OCPNODE-3932: Add automated tests for non-CNV swap configuration#30807
OCPNODE-3932: Add automated tests for non-CNV swap configuration#30807BhargaviGudi wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: automatic mode |
|
@BhargaviGudi: This pull request references OCPNODE-3932 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-conformance |
|
@BhargaviGudi: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/371272f0-115e-11f1-870d-84023c2ce795-0 |
97336a9 to
350340b
Compare
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: BhargaviGudi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Scheduling required tests: |
350340b to
00cdbe8
Compare
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-conformance |
|
@BhargaviGudi: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/531edb50-1190-11f1-8b42-574034db1f18-0 |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.22-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node |
|
@BhargaviGudi: trigger 0 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command |
1 similar comment
|
@BhargaviGudi: trigger 0 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command |
00cdbe8 to
2a38891
Compare
|
@BhargaviGudi: This pull request references OCPNODE-3932 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Scheduling required tests: |
|
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn |
|
/verified by @BhargaviGudi |
|
@BhargaviGudi: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest |
|
Note: e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 and e2e-vsphere-ovn are failing due to cluster installation failure. |
|
Updated Topology Support
|
|
/verified by @BhargaviGudi |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-conformance |
|
@BhargaviGudi: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@BhargaviGudi: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/62478d70-17b2-11f1-8a44-03c89f414b91-0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
test/extended/node/node_swap.go (2)
35-42:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorAdd explicit SNO and Hypershift skips in
BeforeEach.Line 35 only gates MicroShift. This test suite is intended to skip SNO and Hypershift too, and missing guards can make these flows invalid/flaky.
Suggested fix
g.BeforeEach(func(ctx context.Context) { // Skip all tests on MicroShift clusters isMicroShift, err := exutil.IsMicroShiftCluster(oc.AdminKubeClient()) o.Expect(err).NotTo(o.HaveOccurred()) if isMicroShift { g.Skip("Skipping test on MicroShift cluster") } + + isSingleNode, err := exutil.IsSingleNode(ctx, oc.AdminConfigClient()) + o.Expect(err).NotTo(o.HaveOccurred()) + if isSingleNode { + g.Skip("Skipping test on SingleNode cluster") + } + + isHypershift, err := exutil.IsHypershift(ctx, oc.AdminConfigClient()) + o.Expect(err).NotTo(o.HaveOccurred()) + if isHypershift { + g.Skip("Skipping test on Hypershift cluster") + } })🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@test/extended/node/node_swap.go` around lines 35 - 42, The BeforeEach currently only checks exutil.IsMicroShiftCluster and skips MicroShift; extend it to also detect and skip SNO and Hypershift flows by calling the corresponding helpers (e.g., exutil.IsSNOCluster(...) and exutil.IsHypershiftCluster(...) or the project’s equivalent helper functions) using oc.AdminKubeClient(), check and o.Expect(errors) as done for MicroShift, and call g.Skip with clear messages like "Skipping test on SNO cluster" and "Skipping test on Hypershift cluster" when those helpers return true; keep the same error handling pattern used for IsMicroShiftCluster to maintain consistency.
113-118:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorDo not make MachineConfig invariance checks conditional on read success.
Lines 115 and 186 silently bypass the key assertion when
MachineConfigs().Get(...)fails, so the test can pass without proving no update occurred.Suggested fix
workerMC, err := mcClient.MachineconfigurationV1().MachineConfigs().Get(ctx, workerGeneratedKubeletMC, metav1.GetOptions{}) - initialResourceVersion := "" - if err == nil { - initialResourceVersion = workerMC.ResourceVersion - framework.Logf("Initial %s resourceVersion: %s", workerGeneratedKubeletMC, initialResourceVersion) - } + o.Expect(err).NotTo(o.HaveOccurred(), "Failed to get initial machine config %s", workerGeneratedKubeletMC) + initialResourceVersion := workerMC.ResourceVersion + framework.Logf("Initial %s resourceVersion: %s", workerGeneratedKubeletMC, initialResourceVersion) @@ workerMC, err = mcClient.MachineconfigurationV1().MachineConfigs().Get(ctx, workerGeneratedKubeletMC, metav1.GetOptions{}) - if err == nil { - o.Expect(workerMC.ResourceVersion).To(o.Equal(initialResourceVersion), "Machine config %s should not be updated when failSwapOn is rejected", workerGeneratedKubeletMC) - framework.Logf("Verified: %s was not updated (resourceVersion: %s)", workerGeneratedKubeletMC, workerMC.ResourceVersion) - } + o.Expect(err).NotTo(o.HaveOccurred(), "Failed to get machine config %s after KubeletConfig rejection", workerGeneratedKubeletMC) + o.Expect(workerMC.ResourceVersion).To(o.Equal(initialResourceVersion), "Machine config %s should not be updated when failSwapOn is rejected", workerGeneratedKubeletMC) + framework.Logf("Verified: %s was not updated (resourceVersion: %s)", workerGeneratedKubeletMC, workerMC.ResourceVersion)Also applies to: 185-189
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@test/extended/node/node_swap.go` around lines 113 - 118, The test currently skips the invariance assertion when MachineConfigs().Get(...) fails; instead ensure a hard failure on read error so the test cannot pass silently: when calling mcClient.MachineconfigurationV1().MachineConfigs().Get(ctx, workerGeneratedKubeletMC, metav1.GetOptions{}) (variable workerMC, err) check err and fail the test (e.g. t.Fatalf or framework.Fail/ExpectNoError) if non-nil, otherwise set initialResourceVersion = workerMC.ResourceVersion and log; do the same for the later Get before the invariance assertion so the assertion always runs only after successful reads.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Duplicate comments:
In `@test/extended/node/node_swap.go`:
- Around line 35-42: The BeforeEach currently only checks
exutil.IsMicroShiftCluster and skips MicroShift; extend it to also detect and
skip SNO and Hypershift flows by calling the corresponding helpers (e.g.,
exutil.IsSNOCluster(...) and exutil.IsHypershiftCluster(...) or the project’s
equivalent helper functions) using oc.AdminKubeClient(), check and
o.Expect(errors) as done for MicroShift, and call g.Skip with clear messages
like "Skipping test on SNO cluster" and "Skipping test on Hypershift cluster"
when those helpers return true; keep the same error handling pattern used for
IsMicroShiftCluster to maintain consistency.
- Around line 113-118: The test currently skips the invariance assertion when
MachineConfigs().Get(...) fails; instead ensure a hard failure on read error so
the test cannot pass silently: when calling
mcClient.MachineconfigurationV1().MachineConfigs().Get(ctx,
workerGeneratedKubeletMC, metav1.GetOptions{}) (variable workerMC, err) check
err and fail the test (e.g. t.Fatalf or framework.Fail/ExpectNoError) if
non-nil, otherwise set initialResourceVersion = workerMC.ResourceVersion and
log; do the same for the later Get before the invariance assertion so the
assertion always runs only after successful reads.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 37e6bab2-15c7-492d-ba43-a4af08e8773b
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
go.modtest/extended/node/node_swap.gotest/extended/node/node_utils.go
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- test/extended/node/node_utils.go
|
@BhargaviGudi: This pull request references OCPNODE-3932 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Scheduling required tests: |
Ran make verify-deps Skip for hypershift cluster Skip for SNO clusters OCPNODE-3932: Fix swap test for Hypershift and improve robustness OCPNODE-3932: Add SNO support for node swap tests by filtering dual-role nodes OCPNODE-3932: Skip OCP-86395 on hypershift cluster
edee808 to
b749d6b
Compare
|
@BhargaviGudi: This pull request references OCPNODE-3932 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-conformance |
|
@BhargaviGudi: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/f73e6d20-17e1-11f1-9a8c-ae50b3c2f1d4-0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
test/extended/node/node_swap.go (1)
118-126:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorFail test when MachineConfig reads fail (don’t silently skip invariance checks).
At Line 122 and Line 193, guarding with
if err == nilallows a pass without proving99-worker-generated-kubeletstayed unchanged. This should be a hard assertion (or an explicit topology-guarded branch), not silent continuation.Suggested fix
g.By("Getting initial machine config resourceVersion") // Get the initial resourceVersion of the worker machine config before creating KubeletConfig workerMC, err := mcClient.MachineconfigurationV1().MachineConfigs().Get(ctx, workerGeneratedKubeletMC, metav1.GetOptions{}) - initialResourceVersion := "" - if err == nil { - initialResourceVersion = workerMC.ResourceVersion - framework.Logf("Initial %s resourceVersion: %s", workerGeneratedKubeletMC, initialResourceVersion) - } + o.Expect(err).NotTo(o.HaveOccurred(), "Failed to get initial machine config %s", workerGeneratedKubeletMC) + initialResourceVersion := workerMC.ResourceVersion + framework.Logf("Initial %s resourceVersion: %s", workerGeneratedKubeletMC, initialResourceVersion) @@ // Check if the machine config was created or updated (compare to initial resourceVersion captured earlier) workerMC, err = mcClient.MachineconfigurationV1().MachineConfigs().Get(ctx, workerGeneratedKubeletMC, metav1.GetOptions{}) - if err == nil { - o.Expect(workerMC.ResourceVersion).To(o.Equal(initialResourceVersion), "Machine config %s should not be updated when failSwapOn is rejected", workerGeneratedKubeletMC) - framework.Logf("Verified: %s was not updated (resourceVersion: %s)", workerGeneratedKubeletMC, workerMC.ResourceVersion) - } + o.Expect(err).NotTo(o.HaveOccurred(), "Failed to get machine config %s after rejection", workerGeneratedKubeletMC) + o.Expect(workerMC.ResourceVersion).To(o.Equal(initialResourceVersion), "Machine config %s should not be updated when failSwapOn is rejected", workerGeneratedKubeletMC) + framework.Logf("Verified: %s was not updated (resourceVersion: %s)", workerGeneratedKubeletMC, workerMC.ResourceVersion)Also applies to: 191-196
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@test/extended/node/node_swap.go` around lines 118 - 126, The code silently skips the invariance check when reading the MachineConfig fails; change the guarded reads into hard test failures by asserting the Get calls succeed: for the initial read (mcClient.MachineconfigurationV1().MachineConfigs().Get and variable workerMC/initialResourceVersion) and the later final read (the corresponding Get that compares resource versions), replace the `if err == nil` guard with a test assertion that the error is nil (e.g., Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred()) or require.NoError(err)) so the test fails immediately if the MachineConfig reads fail, and only then set/compare the ResourceVersion values.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Duplicate comments:
In `@test/extended/node/node_swap.go`:
- Around line 118-126: The code silently skips the invariance check when reading
the MachineConfig fails; change the guarded reads into hard test failures by
asserting the Get calls succeed: for the initial read
(mcClient.MachineconfigurationV1().MachineConfigs().Get and variable
workerMC/initialResourceVersion) and the later final read (the corresponding Get
that compares resource versions), replace the `if err == nil` guard with a test
assertion that the error is nil (e.g., Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred()) or
require.NoError(err)) so the test fails immediately if the MachineConfig reads
fail, and only then set/compare the ResourceVersion values.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 7512064c-b8e0-459b-8122-054820782027
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
go.modtest/extended/node/node_swap.gotest/extended/node/node_utils.go
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- go.mod
|
Scheduling required tests: |
|
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-conformance |
|
@BhargaviGudi: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/8612cd00-1852-11f1-82b9-294a16837c8e-0 |
|
Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: b749d6b
|
1 similar comment
|
Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: b749d6b
|
|
/verified by @BhargaviGudi |
|
@BhargaviGudi: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest-required |
|
Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: b749d6b
|
|
Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: b749d6b
|
|
/retest-required |
|
@BhargaviGudi: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Summary
Adds automated tests for non-CNV swap configuration on OpenShift nodes.
Jira story: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPNODE-3932
Validates:
Files Added
test/extended/node/node_swap.go- Test casestest/extended/node/node_utils.go- Helper functions for node and kubelet config operationsTopology Support
Test cases:
OCP-86394
OCP-86395
[Jira:Node][sig-node] Node non-cnv swap configuration should have correct default kubelet swap settings with worker nodes failSwapOn=false, control plane nodes failSwapOn=true, and both swapBehavior=NoSwap [Jira:Node] [OCP-86394] github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/node/node_swap.go:46 STEP: Creating a kubernetes client @ 01/12/26 13:53:15.953 I0112 13:53:15.954150 54173 discovery.go:214] Invalidating discovery information I0112 13:53:19.087172 54173 client.go:293] configPath is now "/tmp/configfile1332138601" I0112 13:53:19.087205 54173 client.go:368] The user is now "e2e-test-node-swap-btg8f-user" I0112 13:53:19.087220 54173 client.go:370] Creating project "e2e-test-node-swap-btg8f" I0112 13:53:19.509151 54173 client.go:378] Waiting on permissions in project "e2e-test-node-swap-btg8f" ... I0112 13:53:20.757654 54173 client.go:407] DeploymentConfig capability is enabled, adding 'deployer' SA to the list of default SAs I0112 13:53:21.030854 54173 client.go:422] Waiting for ServiceAccount "default" to be provisioned... I0112 13:53:21.780319 54173 client.go:422] Waiting for ServiceAccount "builder" to be provisioned... I0112 13:53:22.497353 54173 client.go:422] Waiting for ServiceAccount "deployer" to be provisioned... I0112 13:53:23.214772 54173 client.go:432] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:image-pullers" to be provisioned... I0112 13:53:23.828307 54173 client.go:432] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:image-builders" to be provisioned... I0112 13:53:24.362820 54173 client.go:432] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:deployers" to be provisioned... I0112 13:53:25.572055 54173 client.go:465] Project "e2e-test-node-swap-btg8f" has been fully provisioned. I0112 13:53:25.876964 54173 framework.go:2334] microshift-version configmap not found STEP: Getting worker nodes @ 01/12/26 13:53:25.877 STEP: Validating kubelet configuration on each worker node @ 01/12/26 13:53:26.184 STEP: Checking failSwapOn=false on worker node bgudi-j12-kgf87-worker-a-ks7zw @ 01/12/26 13:53:26.491 I0112 13:53:26.491051 54173 node_swap.go:60] Worker node bgudi-j12-kgf87-worker-a-ks7zw: failSwapOn=false ✓ STEP: Checking swapBehavior=NoSwap on worker node bgudi-j12-kgf87-worker-a-ks7zw @ 01/12/26 13:53:26.491 I0112 13:53:26.491076 54173 node_swap.go:65] Worker node bgudi-j12-kgf87-worker-a-ks7zw: swapBehavior=NoSwap ✓ STEP: Checking failSwapOn=false on worker node bgudi-j12-kgf87-worker-b-hnkhq @ 01/12/26 13:53:26.799 I0112 13:53:26.799069 54173 node_swap.go:60] Worker node bgudi-j12-kgf87-worker-b-hnkhq: failSwapOn=false ✓ STEP: Checking swapBehavior=NoSwap on worker node bgudi-j12-kgf87-worker-b-hnkhq @ 01/12/26 13:53:26.799 I0112 13:53:26.799116 54173 node_swap.go:65] Worker node bgudi-j12-kgf87-worker-b-hnkhq: swapBehavior=NoSwap ✓ STEP: Checking failSwapOn=false on worker node bgudi-j12-kgf87-worker-c-xbbkd @ 01/12/26 13:53:27.105 I0112 13:53:27.105627 54173 node_swap.go:60] Worker node bgudi-j12-kgf87-worker-c-xbbkd: failSwapOn=false ✓ STEP: Checking swapBehavior=NoSwap on worker node bgudi-j12-kgf87-worker-c-xbbkd @ 01/12/26 13:53:27.105 I0112 13:53:27.105664 54173 node_swap.go:65] Worker node bgudi-j12-kgf87-worker-c-xbbkd: swapBehavior=NoSwap ✓ STEP: Getting control plane nodes @ 01/12/26 13:53:27.105 STEP: Validating kubelet configuration on each control plane node @ 01/12/26 13:53:27.404 STEP: Checking failSwapOn=true on control plane node bgudi-j12-kgf87-master-0.us-central1-a.c.openshift-qe.internal @ 01/12/26 13:53:27.695 I0112 13:53:27.695585 54173 node_swap.go:81] Control plane node bgudi-j12-kgf87-master-0.us-central1-a.c.openshift-qe.internal: failSwapOn=true ✓ STEP: Checking swapBehavior=NoSwap on control plane node bgudi-j12-kgf87-master-0.us-central1-a.c.openshift-qe.internal @ 01/12/26 13:53:27.695 I0112 13:53:27.695623 54173 node_swap.go:86] Control plane node bgudi-j12-kgf87-master-0.us-central1-a.c.openshift-qe.internal: swapBehavior=NoSwap ✓ STEP: Checking failSwapOn=true on control plane node bgudi-j12-kgf87-master-1.us-central1-b.c.openshift-qe.internal @ 01/12/26 13:53:28.006 I0112 13:53:28.007013 54173 node_swap.go:81] Control plane node bgudi-j12-kgf87-master-1.us-central1-b.c.openshift-qe.internal: failSwapOn=true ✓ STEP: Checking swapBehavior=NoSwap on control plane node bgudi-j12-kgf87-master-1.us-central1-b.c.openshift-qe.internal @ 01/12/26 13:53:28.007 I0112 13:53:28.007073 54173 node_swap.go:86] Control plane node bgudi-j12-kgf87-master-1.us-central1-b.c.openshift-qe.internal: swapBehavior=NoSwap ✓ STEP: Checking failSwapOn=true on control plane node bgudi-j12-kgf87-master-2.us-central1-c.c.openshift-qe.internal @ 01/12/26 13:53:28.295 I0112 13:53:28.295523 54173 node_swap.go:81] Control plane node bgudi-j12-kgf87-master-2.us-central1-c.c.openshift-qe.internal: failSwapOn=true ✓ STEP: Checking swapBehavior=NoSwap on control plane node bgudi-j12-kgf87-master-2.us-central1-c.c.openshift-qe.internal @ 01/12/26 13:53:28.295 I0112 13:53:28.295549 54173 node_swap.go:86] Control plane node bgudi-j12-kgf87-master-2.us-central1-c.c.openshift-qe.internal: swapBehavior=NoSwap ✓ I0112 13:53:28.295564 54173 node_swap.go:88] Test PASSED: All nodes have correct default swap settings I0112 13:53:28.641012 54173 client.go:681] Deleted {user.openshift.io/v1, Resource=users e2e-test-node-swap-btg8f-user}, err: I0112 13:53:28.920122 54173 client.go:681] Deleted {oauth.openshift.io/v1, Resource=oauthclients e2e-client-e2e-test-node-swap-btg8f}, err: I0112 13:53:29.205068 54173 client.go:681] Deleted {oauth.openshift.io/v1, Resource=oauthaccesstokens sha256~B0he02YdA3rQmivC_6pxgH1W-Fq8OxWRhXi4bkQlJnk}, err: STEP: Destroying namespace "e2e-test-node-swap-btg8f" for this suite. @ 01/12/26 13:53:29.205 • [13.618 seconds] ------------------------------ Ran 1 of 1 Specs in 13.618 seconds SUCCESS! -- 1 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 SkippedWill run 1 of 1 specs ------------------------------ [Jira:Node][sig-node] Node non-cnv swap configuration should reject user override of swap settings via KubeletConfig API [OCP-86395] github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/node/node_swap.go:91 STEP: Creating a kubernetes client @ 01/12/26 15:25:28.344 I0112 15:25:28.345790 88048 discovery.go:214] Invalidating discovery information I0112 15:25:33.846094 88048 client.go:293] configPath is now "/tmp/configfile1714018848" I0112 15:25:33.846149 88048 client.go:368] The user is now "e2e-test-node-swap-9tzrc-user" I0112 15:25:33.846161 88048 client.go:370] Creating project "e2e-test-node-swap-9tzrc" I0112 15:25:34.199847 88048 client.go:378] Waiting on permissions in project "e2e-test-node-swap-9tzrc" ... I0112 15:25:35.381516 88048 client.go:407] DeploymentConfig capability is enabled, adding 'deployer' SA to the list of default SAs I0112 15:25:35.640898 88048 client.go:422] Waiting for ServiceAccount "default" to be provisioned... I0112 15:25:36.300768 88048 client.go:422] Waiting for ServiceAccount "builder" to be provisioned... I0112 15:25:37.016542 88048 client.go:422] Waiting for ServiceAccount "deployer" to be provisioned... I0112 15:25:37.731628 88048 client.go:432] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:image-pullers" to be provisioned... I0112 15:25:38.398078 88048 client.go:432] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:image-builders" to be provisioned... I0112 15:25:39.013079 88048 client.go:432] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:deployers" to be provisioned... I0112 15:25:40.139612 88048 client.go:465] Project "e2e-test-node-swap-9tzrc" has been fully provisioned. I0112 15:25:40.446533 88048 framework.go:2334] microshift-version configmap not found STEP: Creating machine config client @ 01/12/26 15:25:40.446 STEP: Getting initial machine config resourceVersion @ 01/12/26 15:25:40.446 STEP: Creating a KubeletConfig with swap settings @ 01/12/26 15:25:40.704 STEP: Attempting to apply the KubeletConfig @ 01/12/26 15:25:40.704 I0112 15:25:40.704259 88048 node_swap.go:126] Creating KubeletConfig with failSwapOn=true and swapBehavior=LimitedSwap STEP: Checking KubeletConfig status for expected error message @ 01/12/26 15:25:40.963 I0112 15:25:43.234048 88048 node_swap.go:152] Found Failure condition: Error: KubeletConfiguration: failSwapOn is not allowed to be set, but contains: true STEP: Verifying machine config was not created or updated @ 01/12/26 15:25:43.234 STEP: Verifying worker nodes still have correct swap settings @ 01/12/26 15:25:48.508 STEP: Verifying failSwapOn=false remains unchanged on worker node ci-op-5v1xq5wl-10999-jrj4s-worker-centralus1-9dz4n @ 01/12/26 15:25:49.458 I0112 15:25:49.458183 88048 node_swap.go:185] Worker node ci-op-5v1xq5wl-10999-jrj4s-worker-centralus1-9dz4n: failSwapOn=false (unchanged) ✓ STEP: Verifying swapBehavior=NoSwap remains unchanged on worker node ci-op-5v1xq5wl-10999-jrj4s-worker-centralus1-9dz4n @ 01/12/26 15:25:49.458 I0112 15:25:49.458219 88048 node_swap.go:190] Worker node ci-op-5v1xq5wl-10999-jrj4s-worker-centralus1-9dz4n: swapBehavior=NoSwap (unchanged) ✓ STEP: Verifying failSwapOn=false remains unchanged on worker node ci-op-5v1xq5wl-10999-jrj4s-worker-centralus2-75l7t @ 01/12/26 15:25:49.754 I0112 15:25:49.754444 88048 node_swap.go:185] Worker node ci-op-5v1xq5wl-10999-jrj4s-worker-centralus2-75l7t: failSwapOn=false (unchanged) ✓ STEP: Verifying swapBehavior=NoSwap remains unchanged on worker node ci-op-5v1xq5wl-10999-jrj4s-worker-centralus2-75l7t @ 01/12/26 15:25:49.754 I0112 15:25:49.754525 88048 node_swap.go:190] Worker node ci-op-5v1xq5wl-10999-jrj4s-worker-centralus2-75l7t: swapBehavior=NoSwap (unchanged) ✓ STEP: Verifying failSwapOn=false remains unchanged on worker node ci-op-5v1xq5wl-10999-jrj4s-worker-centralus3-9lnrz @ 01/12/26 15:25:50.073 I0112 15:25:50.073677 88048 node_swap.go:185] Worker node ci-op-5v1xq5wl-10999-jrj4s-worker-centralus3-9lnrz: failSwapOn=false (unchanged) ✓ STEP: Verifying swapBehavior=NoSwap remains unchanged on worker node ci-op-5v1xq5wl-10999-jrj4s-worker-centralus3-9lnrz @ 01/12/26 15:25:50.073 I0112 15:25:50.073813 88048 node_swap.go:190] Worker node ci-op-5v1xq5wl-10999-jrj4s-worker-centralus3-9lnrz: swapBehavior=NoSwap (unchanged) ✓ I0112 15:25:50.073838 88048 node_swap.go:193] Test PASSED: KubeletConfig with failSwapOn was properly rejected I0112 15:25:50.687721 88048 client.go:681] Deleted {user.openshift.io/v1, Resource=users e2e-test-node-swap-9tzrc-user}, err: I0112 15:25:50.993412 88048 client.go:681] Deleted {oauth.openshift.io/v1, Resource=oauthclients e2e-client-e2e-test-node-swap-9tzrc}, err: I0112 15:25:51.258458 88048 client.go:681] Deleted {oauth.openshift.io/v1, Resource=oauthaccesstokens sha256~urJPAAwYTdNinFhNqG-lZ1UzWd8-qHq8FcVca9OcY-s}, err: STEP: Destroying namespace "e2e-test-node-swap-9tzrc" for this suite. @ 01/12/26 15:25:51.258 • [23.184 seconds] ------------------------------ Ran 1 of 1 Specs in 23.185 seconds SUCCESS! -- 1 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 SkippedSNO cluster:
bgudi@bgudi-thinkpadp16vgen1:~/work/src/github.com/openshift/origin$ ./openshift-tests run-test "[Jira:Node][sig-node] Node non-cnv swap configuration should have correct default kubelet swap settings with worker nodes failSwapOn=false, control plane nodes failSwapOn=true, and both swapBehavior=NoSwap [OCP-86394] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]" Will run 1 of 1 specs ------------------------------ [Jira:Node][sig-node] Node non-cnv swap configuration should have correct default kubelet swap settings with worker nodes failSwapOn=false, control plane nodes failSwapOn=true, and both swapBehavior=NoSwap [OCP-86394] [Lifecycle:informing] github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/node/node_swap.go:50 STEP: Creating a kubernetes client @ 03/04/26 15:33:03.101 I0304 15:33:03.103518 299959 discovery.go:214] Invalidating discovery information I0304 15:33:07.633203 299959 client.go:293] configPath is now "/tmp/configfile2782002196" I0304 15:33:07.633241 299959 client.go:368] The user is now "e2e-test-node-swap-qctd4-user" I0304 15:33:07.633252 299959 client.go:370] Creating project "e2e-test-node-swap-qctd4" I0304 15:33:08.112626 299959 client.go:378] Waiting on permissions in project "e2e-test-node-swap-qctd4" ... I0304 15:33:09.458249 299959 client.go:407] DeploymentConfig capability is enabled, adding 'deployer' SA to the list of default SAs I0304 15:33:09.846675 299959 client.go:422] Waiting for ServiceAccount "default" to be provisioned... I0304 15:33:11.076018 299959 client.go:422] Waiting for ServiceAccount "builder" to be provisioned... I0304 15:33:11.690096 299959 client.go:422] Waiting for ServiceAccount "deployer" to be provisioned... I0304 15:33:12.396775 299959 client.go:432] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:image-pullers" to be provisioned... I0304 15:33:12.924954 299959 client.go:432] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:image-builders" to be provisioned... I0304 15:33:13.790514 299959 client.go:432] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:deployers" to be provisioned... I0304 15:33:15.982522 299959 client.go:469] Project "e2e-test-node-swap-qctd4" has been fully provisioned. I0304 15:33:15.984454 299959 framework.go:2324] [precondition-check] checking if cluster is MicroShift I0304 15:33:17.638344 299959 framework.go:2348] IsMicroShiftCluster: microshift-version configmap not found, not MicroShift STEP: Getting worker nodes @ 03/04/26 15:33:17.638 I0304 15:33:18.536409 299959 node_utils.go:77] Skipping worker validation for node ip-10-0-22-126.us-east-2.compute.internal (also has control-plane role, e.g. SNO) STEP: Validating kubelet configuration on each worker node @ 03/04/26 15:33:18.536 STEP: Getting control plane nodes @ 03/04/26 15:33:18.824 STEP: Validating kubelet configuration on each control plane node @ 03/04/26 15:33:19.623 STEP: Checking failSwapOn=true on control plane node ip-10-0-22-126.us-east-2.compute.internal @ 03/04/26 15:33:20.063 I0304 15:33:20.063821 299959 node_swap.go:93] Control plane node ip-10-0-22-126.us-east-2.compute.internal: failSwapOn=true ✓ STEP: Checking swapBehavior=NoSwap on control plane node ip-10-0-22-126.us-east-2.compute.internal @ 03/04/26 15:33:20.063 I0304 15:33:20.063885 299959 node_swap.go:98] Control plane node ip-10-0-22-126.us-east-2.compute.internal: swapBehavior=NoSwap ✓ I0304 15:33:20.063899 299959 node_swap.go:103] Test PASSED: All nodes have correct default swap settings I0304 15:33:20.304255 299959 client.go:689] Deleted {user.openshift.io/v1, Resource=users e2e-test-node-swap-qctd4-user}, err: I0304 15:33:20.734253 299959 client.go:689] Deleted {oauth.openshift.io/v1, Resource=oauthclients e2e-client-e2e-test-node-swap-qctd4}, err: I0304 15:33:20.976042 299959 client.go:689] Deleted {oauth.openshift.io/v1, Resource=oauthaccesstokens sha256~XRn1FBV-s1HY8U02dO2hmkUjxtvC5BMIZ5FQyDCnRno}, err: STEP: Destroying namespace "e2e-test-node-swap-qctd4" for this suite. @ 03/04/26 15:33:20.976 • [18.282 seconds] ------------------------------ Ran 1 of 1 Specs in 18.282 seconds SUCCESS! -- 1 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 Skipped $./openshift-tests run-test "[Jira:Node][sig-node] Node non-cnv swap configuration should reject user override of swap settings via KubeletConfig API [OCP-86395] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]" Will run 1 of 1 specs ------------------------------ [Jira:Node][sig-node] Node non-cnv swap configuration should reject user override of swap settings via KubeletConfig API [OCP-86395] [Lifecycle:informing] github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/node/node_swap.go:106 STEP: Creating a kubernetes client @ 03/04/26 15:34:25.551 I0304 15:34:25.552959 300456 discovery.go:214] Invalidating discovery information I0304 15:34:29.034099 300456 client.go:293] configPath is now "/tmp/configfile1358489074" I0304 15:34:29.034152 300456 client.go:368] The user is now "e2e-test-node-swap-964qb-user" I0304 15:34:29.034164 300456 client.go:370] Creating project "e2e-test-node-swap-964qb" I0304 15:34:29.321334 300456 client.go:378] Waiting on permissions in project "e2e-test-node-swap-964qb" ... I0304 15:34:30.817231 300456 client.go:407] DeploymentConfig capability is enabled, adding 'deployer' SA to the list of default SAs I0304 15:34:31.109080 300456 client.go:422] Waiting for ServiceAccount "default" to be provisioned... I0304 15:34:32.142195 300456 client.go:422] Waiting for ServiceAccount "builder" to be provisioned... I0304 15:34:32.891317 300456 client.go:422] Waiting for ServiceAccount "deployer" to be provisioned... I0304 15:34:33.616554 300456 client.go:432] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:image-pullers" to be provisioned... I0304 15:34:34.084013 300456 client.go:432] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:image-builders" to be provisioned... I0304 15:34:35.203581 300456 client.go:432] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:deployers" to be provisioned... I0304 15:34:37.109754 300456 client.go:469] Project "e2e-test-node-swap-964qb" has been fully provisioned. I0304 15:34:37.111343 300456 framework.go:2324] [precondition-check] checking if cluster is MicroShift I0304 15:34:37.501096 300456 framework.go:2348] IsMicroShiftCluster: microshift-version configmap not found, not MicroShift STEP: Creating machine config client @ 03/04/26 15:34:37.501 STEP: Getting initial machine config resourceVersion @ 03/04/26 15:34:37.501 STEP: Creating a KubeletConfig with swap settings @ 03/04/26 15:34:37.75 STEP: Attempting to apply the KubeletConfig @ 03/04/26 15:34:37.75 I0304 15:34:37.750241 300456 node_swap.go:144] Creating KubeletConfig with failSwapOn=true and swapBehavior=LimitedSwap STEP: Checking KubeletConfig status for expected error message @ 03/04/26 15:34:38.101 I0304 15:34:40.370776 300456 node_swap.go:170] Found Failure condition: Error: KubeletConfiguration: failSwapOn is not allowed to be set, but contains: true STEP: Verifying machine config was not created or updated @ 03/04/26 15:34:40.37 STEP: Verifying worker nodes still have correct swap settings @ 03/04/26 15:34:45.618 I0304 15:34:46.307006 300456 node_utils.go:77] Skipping worker validation for node ip-10-0-22-126.us-east-2.compute.internal (also has control-plane role, e.g. SNO) I0304 15:34:46.307057 300456 node_swap.go:214] Test PASSED: KubeletConfig with failSwapOn was properly rejected I0304 15:34:46.918385 300456 client.go:689] Deleted {user.openshift.io/v1, Resource=users e2e-test-node-swap-964qb-user}, err: I0304 15:34:47.156147 300456 client.go:689] Deleted {oauth.openshift.io/v1, Resource=oauthclients e2e-client-e2e-test-node-swap-964qb}, err: I0304 15:34:47.538464 300456 client.go:689] Deleted {oauth.openshift.io/v1, Resource=oauthaccesstokens sha256~1Mn0aC-AWC_7Muifjcz-c-r5DS6DAJ6CK6tyDlkC9Fw}, err: STEP: Destroying namespace "e2e-test-node-swap-964qb" for this suite. @ 03/04/26 15:34:47.538 • [22.406 seconds] ------------------------------ Ran 1 of 1 Specs in 22.406 seconds SUCCESS! -- 1 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 SkippedSummary by CodeRabbit
Tests
Chores