-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
MCO-2006: move node-filecycle monitor to default #30592
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
MCO-2006: move node-filecycle monitor to default #30592
Conversation
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: automatic mode |
|
@sergiordlr: This pull request references MCO-2006 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Scheduling required tests: |
|
@sergiordlr: This PR was included in a payload test run from openshift/machine-config-operator#5466
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/73bc4330-d5da-11f0-9bb4-9cb64c814439-0 |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: neisw, sergiordlr The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@sergiordlr: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
The payload job with both PRs reported all tests passing and no issue. /verified by @sergiordlr |
|
@sergiordlr: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
We are migrating the MCO test cases from the private repo to the MCO repo.
When we have migrated the pinimagesets test cases, executed in a disruptive test suite, the node-lifecycle started failing reporting diskpressure, nodes not ready and unreachable. It was cased by our tests that enforce those scenarios in the nodes to make sure that the pinimagesets functionality is working fine.
In this PR we move the node-lifecycle monitor tests from Universal to Default, so that they are not executed in disruptive test suites.