Skip to content

Conversation

@sergiordlr
Copy link
Contributor

We are migrating the MCO test cases from the private repo to the MCO repo.

When we have migrated the pinimagesets test cases, executed in a disruptive test suite, the node-lifecycle started failing reporting diskpressure, nodes not ready and unreachable. It was cased by our tests that enforce those scenarios in the nodes to make sure that the pinimagesets functionality is working fine.

In this PR we move the node-lifecycle monitor tests from Universal to Default, so that they are not executed in disruptive test suites.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Dec 10, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 10, 2025

@sergiordlr: This pull request references MCO-2006 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

We are migrating the MCO test cases from the private repo to the MCO repo.

When we have migrated the pinimagesets test cases, executed in a disruptive test suite, the node-lifecycle started failing reporting diskpressure, nodes not ready and unreachable. It was cased by our tests that enforce those scenarios in the nodes to make sure that the pinimagesets functionality is working fine.

In this PR we move the node-lifecycle monitor tests from Universal to Default, so that they are not executed in disruptive test suites.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and p0lyn0mial December 10, 2025 13:41
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 10, 2025

@sergiordlr: This PR was included in a payload test run from openshift/machine-config-operator#5466
trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-fips-proxy-longduration

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/73bc4330-d5da-11f0-9bb4-9cb64c814439-0

@neisw
Copy link
Contributor

neisw commented Dec 10, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 10, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 10, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: neisw, sergiordlr

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 10, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 10, 2025

@sergiordlr: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sergiordlr
Copy link
Contributor Author

The payload job with both PRs reported all tests passing and no issue.

/verified by @sergiordlr

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 12, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sergiordlr: This PR has been marked as verified by @sergiordlr.

Details

In response to this:

The payload job with both PRs reported all tests passing and no issue.

/verified by @sergiordlr

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants