Skip to content

OSDOCS-14810:Removed 'at least' wording for control plane and infra nodes in ROSA Classic cluster failure doc. #95079

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AedinC
Copy link
Contributor

@AedinC AedinC commented Jun 23, 2025

Version(s):
4.19+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14810

Link to docs preview:
Cluster failure

Peer review:

  • Peer reviewer has approved this change.

SME review:

  • SME has approved this change.

QE review:
QE approval is not required as no update to procedural information.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 23, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 23, 2025

@AedinC: This pull request references OSDOCS-14810 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.19+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14810

Link to docs preview:

Peer review:

  • Peer reviewer has approved this change.

SME review:

  • SME has approved this change.

QE review:
QE approval is not required as no update to procedural information.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 23, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 23, 2025

@AedinC: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 23, 2025

@AedinC: This pull request references OSDOCS-14810 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.19+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14810

Link to docs preview:
Cluster failure

Peer review:

  • Peer reviewer has approved this change.

SME review:

  • SME has approved this change.

QE review:
QE approval is not required as no update to procedural information.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@mletalie mletalie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Jun 23, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@mletalie mletalie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/label peer-review-done
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Jun 23, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 23, 2025
@AedinC
Copy link
Contributor Author

AedinC commented Jun 23, 2025

Hi @fahlmant. I have double checked that there are 2 infra nodes for single-az clusters and 3 for multi-az. Is there anything else that needs to be changed here? Thanks.

@AedinC
Copy link
Contributor Author

AedinC commented Jun 24, 2025

@arendej Can you please give a LGTM to this? Many thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants