Skip to content

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #10013

/assign patrickdillon

pkg/destroy/gcp/gcp.go:
** In the case where no error exists but the operation is nil when passed into
gcp.go:handleOperation the destroy process would cause a system panic. Now create an
error in this case so that the destroy process will continue and retry if there are more
pending items.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62981 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63494. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-63494: Catch gcp destroy cases where the operation is nil

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #10013

/assign patrickdillon

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-62981: Catch gcp destroy cases where the operation is nil [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-63494: Catch gcp destroy cases where the operation is nil Oct 23, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 23, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63494, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62981 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #10013

/assign patrickdillon

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@barbacbd
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Copy link
Contributor

@barbacbd barbacbd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 24, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: barbacbd

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 24, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 24, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-secureboot 5547930 link false /test e2e-gcp-secureboot
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-byo-vpc 5547930 link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-byo-vpc
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 5547930 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-default-config 5547930 link false /test e2e-gcp-default-config
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-xpn 5547930 link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-xpn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Member

@tthvo tthvo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 24, 2025
@gpei
Copy link
Contributor

gpei commented Oct 27, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@gpei: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63494, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62981 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@gpei
Copy link
Contributor

gpei commented Oct 27, 2025

cc @jianli-wei

@jianli-wei
Copy link
Contributor

/verified by jiwei

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Oct 29, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jianli-wei: This PR has been marked as verified by jiwei.

In response to this:

/verified by jiwei

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@tthvo
Copy link
Member

tthvo commented Oct 29, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 29, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tthvo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63494, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.18.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62981 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62981 targets the "4.19.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.19.0, 4.19.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jianli-wei

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from jianli-wei October 29, 2025 03:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants