Skip to content

OCPBUGS-48491: Namespace is not persisting when switching to developer view from the topology page of admin page#14812

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
lokanandaprabhu:feature/OCPBUGS-48491
Mar 6, 2025
Merged

OCPBUGS-48491: Namespace is not persisting when switching to developer view from the topology page of admin page#14812
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
lokanandaprabhu:feature/OCPBUGS-48491

Conversation

@lokanandaprabhu
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-48491

Analysis / Root cause:
Active namespace value was not considered in namespace context

Solution Description:
Considered Active namespace value in namespace context

Screen shots / Gifs for design review:

----BEFORE---

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VYg-pWt4ZCYKtmPx4bIK6L2Lkt3WpOPv/view?usp=sharing


---AFTER----

Screen.Recording.2025-03-03.at.3.38.17.PM.mov

Unit test coverage report:
NA

Test setup:

1. Go to topology page on ain view after login
2. Select/Create a namespace 
3. Switch to developer perspective

Browser conformance:

  • Chrome
  • Firefox
  • Safari
  • Edge

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Mar 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@lokanandaprabhu: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48491, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Fixes:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-48491

Analysis / Root cause:
Active namespace value was not considered in namespace context

Solution Description:
Considered Active namespace value in namespace context

Screen shots / Gifs for design review:

----BEFORE---

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VYg-pWt4ZCYKtmPx4bIK6L2Lkt3WpOPv/view?usp=sharing


---AFTER----

Screen.Recording.2025-03-03.at.3.38.17.PM.mov

Unit test coverage report:
NA

Test setup:

  1. Go to topology page on ain view after login
  2. Select/Create a namespace
  3. Switch to developer perspective

Browser conformance:

  • Chrome
  • Firefox
  • Safari
  • Edge

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 3, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from Mylanos and spadgett March 3, 2025 10:41
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the component/core Related to console core functionality label Mar 3, 2025
@lokanandaprabhu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@lokanandaprabhu: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48491, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.19.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sanketpathak

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 3, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from sanketpathak March 3, 2025 10:42
@lokanandaprabhu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @vikram-raj

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from vikram-raj March 3, 2025 10:42
Copy link
Member

@vikram-raj vikram-raj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@vikram-raj
Copy link
Member

/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 5, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 5, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lokanandaprabhu, vikram-raj

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 5, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD c35f1b3 and 2 for PR HEAD 1a985ff in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD f5d923b and 1 for PR HEAD 1a985ff in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD f5d923b and 2 for PR HEAD 1a985ff in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 6, 2025

@lokanandaprabhu: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 7aa832d into openshift:main Mar 6, 2025
8 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@lokanandaprabhu: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48491: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48491 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Fixes:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-48491

Analysis / Root cause:
Active namespace value was not considered in namespace context

Solution Description:
Considered Active namespace value in namespace context

Screen shots / Gifs for design review:

----BEFORE---

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VYg-pWt4ZCYKtmPx4bIK6L2Lkt3WpOPv/view?usp=sharing


---AFTER----

Screen.Recording.2025-03-03.at.3.38.17.PM.mov

Unit test coverage report:
NA

Test setup:

  1. Go to topology page on ain view after login
  2. Select/Create a namespace
  3. Switch to developer perspective

Browser conformance:

  • Chrome
  • Firefox
  • Safari
  • Edge

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@cajieh
Copy link
Contributor

cajieh commented Jan 12, 2026

/cherry-pick release-4.18

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@cajieh: new pull request created: #15910

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@cajieh
Copy link
Contributor

cajieh commented Mar 17, 2026

/cherry-pick release-4.17

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@cajieh: new pull request created: #16160

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@cajieh
Copy link
Contributor

cajieh commented Mar 17, 2026

/cherry-pick release-4.16

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@cajieh: new pull request created: #16161

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. component/core Related to console core functionality jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants