-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.17] OCPBUGS-44644: PPC: skip comparing ProcessorCore.Index between NUMA c… #1221
base: release-4.17
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…ores (openshift#1213) * PPC: skip comparing ProcessorCore.Index between NUMA cores ProcessorCore.Index indicates the zero-based index of the core in the Cores slice. While core might be shown in a different order, they can still be equivalent. See: jaypipes/ghw#346. Adjust the equality check to skip this field to fix this: ``` Error: targeted nodes differ: nodes host1.development.lab and host2.development.lab have different topology: the CPU cores differ: processor core openshift#20 (2 threads), logical processors [2 66] vs processor core openshift#20 (2 threads), logical processors [2 66] ``` And add a unit test to cover this scenario. Signed-off-by: Shereen Haj <[email protected]> * PPC: unit: rename test variables to avoid misusing Rename test variables and add clarifying comments to avoid misusing them while writing tests. Signed-off-by: Shereen Haj <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Shereen Haj <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit ad4a69f)
@shajmakh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44644, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.16 release-4.15 release-4.14 release-4.13 release-4.12 |
@shajmakh: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
hypershift lane is flaky due to a known issue and the hypershift team is aware about |
@shajmakh: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ffromani, shajmakh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
…ores (#1213)
manual backport and typo fixes of #1213