[openshift-4.18] Re-add exemptions for Libreswan as it was pinned back in 4.18 ovn-k. #7294
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: joepvd The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
Pinned back in openshift/ovn-kubernetes#2678. Keeping the consistency requirement between ovn-k and rhcos. Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>
igsilya
force-pushed
the
libreswan-pin-back-4.18
branch
from
1ecf113 to
e9be6d4
Compare
|
Re-based to fix conflicts with the just merged OVS exemption removal PR. |
|
/lgtm |
openshift-merge-bot
bot
merged commit 9557fe6
into
openshift-eng:openshift-4.18
3 checks passed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cleaning up some mess, as Libreswan was unpinned and the pinned back:
Not a full revert of #7182 as we're keeping the consistency requirement between ovn-k and rhcos.
CC: @joepvd