-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
[prow-job]add bump-release-version command for updating prow jobs #89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
3f93af9 to
fa35ecd
Compare
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jiajliu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
1 similar comment
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jiajliu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
WalkthroughAdds a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User as User (comment)
participant Bot as Prow Job Plugin
participant Parser as Input Parser
participant Detector as Version Detector
participant Generator as File Generator
participant Verifier as Verifier
participant FS as Filesystem
User->>Bot: /prow-job:bump-release-version <files> [--bump=N]
Bot->>Parser: parse args & validate files
Parser-->>Bot: parsed config list, bump value
Bot->>Detector: detect current MAJOR.MINOR in filenames/YAML
Detector-->>Bot: target versions per file
Bot->>Generator: produce updated content (replace versions, adjust cron frequency)
Generator->>FS: write new file(s) with bumped version names
Generator-->>Verifier: provide original vs new content
Verifier-->>Bot: report verification results
Bot-->>User: summary report (files created, replacements, verification)
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
PLUGINS.md(1 hunks)docs/data.json(1 hunks)plugins/prow-job/commands/bump-release-version.md(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/data.json (1)
279-284: Verify metadata consistency:argument_hintvs.synopsis.The
argument_hintfield (line 283) is empty, while thesynopsis(line 282) includes detailed argument specification. Looking at similar commands (e.g.,analyze-resource), populatedargument_hintentries typically correspond to empty or minimal synopsis fields. Clarify the intended pattern: should this be"argument_hint": "<config-file>[,<config-file>...] [--bump=N]"instead?plugins/prow-job/commands/bump-release-version.md (2)
73-97: Clarify cron schedule randomization algorithm and edge cases.The cron schedule generation logic (lines 81-85) describes "randomizing" days while preserving count, but the examples (lines 87-97) show structured, evenly-spaced patterns rather than true randomization. Additionally, the algorithm for selecting new day values is not fully specified:
- How are new day offsets chosen to maintain distribution?
- What happens with odd day counts (e.g., 3 instead of 2 or 4)?
- How are irregular patterns (non-uniform intervals) handled?
The examples assume regular spacing, but real-world cron patterns may vary.
36-102: Comprehensive implementation documentation with strong specification clarity.The five-phase implementation breakdown (Phase 1–5) provides excellent detail for users and developers. Version detection (Phase 2) is well-specified, file transformation (Phase 3, lines 99–102) is straightforward, and the verification/reporting phases are helpful. The examples in the summary (Phase 5, lines 119–139) are particularly useful for understanding expected behavior.
No blocking issues; the cron schedule randomization logic (flagged above) warrants clarification but does not prevent understanding the overall approach.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
plugins/prow-job/commands/bump-release-version.md (1)
36-139: Document error handling and edge cases.The implementation guide is well-structured but would benefit from explicit documentation of error scenarios and edge cases:
- What happens if a config file cannot be found or is unreadable?
- What if the version cannot be detected from the file (all four sources missing or conflicting)?
- How does the command handle files where version detection finds conflicting values across sources?
- Should the command validate that bumped versions are "realistic" (e.g., not bumping 4.99 to 4.100)?
Consider adding an "Error Handling" section before or after the Implementation phases to document these scenarios and the expected behavior.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
PLUGINS.md(1 hunks)docs/data.json(1 hunks)plugins/prow-job/commands/bump-release-version.md(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- PLUGINS.md
- docs/data.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
plugins/prow-job/commands/bump-release-version.md
9-9: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
20-20: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
26-26: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
32-32: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
88-88: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
118-118: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
plugins/prow-job/commands/bump-release-version.md (2)
73-86: Cron frequency preservation logic is well-documented.The specification of how cron schedules are preserved while randomizing timing (randomize MINUTE/HOUR, preserve MONTH pattern and DOW, randomize DAY with same count) is clear and thorough. The examples effectively illustrate the frequency preservation across different patterns (f7, f14, f28, f60).
1-3: Documentation structure and implementation phases are clear.The YAML frontmatter, section organization, and five-phase implementation breakdown provide clear guidance for both users and developers. The version detection sources (filename pattern, base_images, releases, zz_generated_metadata) and target version calculation logic are well-documented with concrete examples.
Also applies to: 38-64
| ``` | ||
| /prow-job:bump-release-version <config-file>[,<config-file>...] [--bump=N] | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add language specifiers to all fenced code blocks.
Markdown best practices require specifying a language identifier for all fenced code blocks to enable syntax highlighting. The blocks at these lines are missing language specifiers:
- Lines 9-11, 20-22, 26-28, 32-34: Use
```bashor```shell - Lines 88-97: Use
```text(for example output) or```bash - Lines 118-139: Use
```text(for example output)
Apply this diff to fix the code block at line 9 as an example:
-```
+```bash
/prow-job:bump-release-version <config-file>[,<config-file>...] [--bump=N]
-```
+```Repeat this pattern for the remaining code blocks.
Also applies to: 20-22, 26-28, 32-34, 88-97, 118-139
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
9-9: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In plugins/prow-job/commands/bump-release-version.md around lines 9-11, 20-22,
26-28, 32-34, 88-97 and 118-139, several fenced code blocks are missing language
specifiers; update each opening fence to include the appropriate language (use
```bash or ```shell for command examples at lines 9-11, 20-22, 26-28, 32-34, use
```text or ```bash for example output at 88-97, and use ```text for example
output at 118-139), following the provided diff pattern (replace ``` with
```bash or ```text as appropriate) so every fenced block has a language
identifier.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds /prow-job:bump-release-version command to support the auto creation of ci-operator config files for new
OpenShift release versions. When preparing for test jobs for a new release (e.g., moving from 4.21 to 4.22), this command:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
N/A
Special notes for your reviewer:
This eliminates the manual, error-prone process of copying and editing several config files when bumping
release versions, ensuring consistency in version references and proper distribution of test schedules.
Checklist: