8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch

[kevinjwalls]

Clean backport to JDK 25.

This change recently integrated in JDK 26 and is through tiers 1 - 4 so far.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch (Bug - P2)

Reviewers

• Alan Bateman (@AlanBateman - Reviewer)
• Serguei Spitsyn (@sspitsyn - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26088/head:pull/26088
$ git checkout pull/26088

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26088
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26088/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26088

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26088

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26088.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back kevinw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into jdk25 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch

Reviewed-by: alanb, sspitsyn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the jdk25 branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the jdk25 branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• core-libs
• hotspot
• jmx
• serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (9dc11405)

[AlanBateman]

/label remove core-libs
/label remove jmx

[AlanBateman]

Clean backport .

[openjdk]

@AlanBateman
The core-libs label was successfully removed.

[openjdk]

@AlanBateman
The jmx label was successfully removed.

[sspitsyn]

It is a clean backport.

[kevinjwalls]

Thanks Alan and Serguei, will integrate this clean backport to 25.

[kevinjwalls]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 92268e1.
Since your change was applied there have been 2 commits pushed to the jdk25 branch:

• a98a5e5: 8360887: (fs) Files.getFileAttributeView returns unusable FileAttributeView if UserDefinedFileAttributeView unavailable (aix)
• b245c51: 8359436: AOTCompileEagerly should not be diagnostic

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls Pushed as commit 92268e1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.