Skip to content

8356320: GifImageDecoder can produce wrong image when GCE changes transparent pixel index #25076

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mickleness
Copy link
Contributor

@mickleness mickleness commented May 7, 2025

When a gif frame's disposal code is DISPOSAL_BGCOLOR and we're maintaining a saved image: we have to flood-fill the frame's bounds. And if the transparent pixel index changes across frames: we could sometimes flood fill the wrong value, resulting in an opaque rectangle in the output image.

(I know this looks similar to #25044 , but if you look at the data structure of the sample gifs: they are separate problems with separate solutions.)


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Warning

 ⚠️ Patch contains a binary file (test/jdk/sun/awt/image/gif/bug8356320/leo.gif)

Issue

  • JDK-8356320: GifImageDecoder can produce wrong image when GCE changes transparent pixel index (Bug - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25076/head:pull/25076
$ git checkout pull/25076

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25076
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25076/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25076

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25076

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25076.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

mickleness and others added 14 commits May 22, 2022 04:50
Merge openjdk/jdk into mickleness/jdk
Updating mickleness/jdk from openjdk/jdk
updating to openjdk/jdk
In this ticket the problem was:
`tpix` was the transparent pixel index of the current `model`. However `decoder.saved_image` uses its own IndexColorModel (see `decoder.saved_model`).

In a simple gif these two models are the same, but in this case the gif has some frames that change the transparent pixel index between frames. We were filling the wrong tpix value, resulting in an opaque rectangle.
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 7, 2025

👋 Welcome back mickleness! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 7, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 7, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 7, 2025

@mickleness The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 7, 2025

Webrevs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client [email protected] rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant