Add org id to settings page header

[Rodri77]

Important

Add organization ID to settings page header in page.tsx.

• UI Enhancement:
  • Add organization ID to settings page header in page.tsx by appending {res.data.id} to the h2 element.

^{This description was created by for 442ff0f. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
openint	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 7, 2025 9:12pm

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 391fe60 in 33 seconds

More details

• Looked at 15 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. apps/web/app/dashboard/(authenticated)/settings/page.tsx:31

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding a null check for res.data before accessing res.data.id to prevent potential runtime errors.

        Settings - {res.data?.id}

• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The code is already properly guarded against null/undefined res.data through the explicit check on line 24. The suggested change would add redundant null checking. The original code is actually cleaner since we know res.data exists at that point.
  Maybe there could be race conditions or async state updates that could make res.data null even after the check? Maybe the null check should be moved closer to usage?
  The null check is part of the component's main rendering logic and React's reconciliation ensures consistent render output based on the state at render time. There's no possibility of res.data becoming null between the check and usage within the same render.
  Delete this comment because it suggests adding unnecessary defensive programming when the code is already properly handling null checks.

Workflow ID: wflow_dHXloPUnzyaGqjYJ

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[github-actions]

Stably Runner - Test Suite - 'Pre Merge CI Checks'

Test Suite Run Result: 🟢 Success (1/1 tests passed) [dashboard]

---

This comment was generated from stably-runner-action

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 442ff0f in 41 seconds

More details

• Looked at 16 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. apps/web/app/dashboard/(authenticated)/settings/page.tsx:30

• Draft comment:
  The organization ID should be included in the header as per the PR description. Consider updating the header to include the ID.

      <h2 className="mb-4 text-2xl font-semibold tracking-tight">Settings - {res.data.id}</h2>

• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment references a PR description we don't have access to. The change appears to be a UI improvement, making the ID more explicit and cleanly separated from the header. This is a pure UI organization change that makes the information more clear. According to our rules, we should not comment on UI organization changes as we should assume the author made these changes intentionally.
  Maybe there's a design system or consistency requirement that mandates IDs to be in headers? Maybe the PR description has important context we're missing?
  Even if there were such requirements, we should not speculate without seeing them. The rules state we should not reference PR descriptions or make UI-only suggestions.
  This comment should be deleted as it's suggesting a UI-only change and referencing unseen PR requirements.

Workflow ID: wflow_N78LMSF0rgEYq3Wo

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.