Use kserve without serverless

[emilys314]

Closes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-16490

Depends on opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator#1565

Description

This extends the defaultDeploymentMode by checking if serverless is available on the cluster. If it's not, we can default kserve to raw.

• If raw is disabled, it should default to serverless still (even if both end up disabled somehow)
• raw is used if flag is enabled but serverless is set as the default
• The auth warning for serverless is moved to below the deployment mode selector if it's visible

When serverless is removed but raw is enabled:

If autherino is not installed and serverless is selected:

If autherino is not installed and raw selected:

How Has This Been Tested?

Overriding the dsc status in chrome networking to add the following:
components.kserve.serverlessMode to "serverlessMode": "Removed"

Test Impact

Added a cypress test

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change.

@yih-wang

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

[openshift-ci]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from emilys314. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.11111% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.14%. Comparing base (3167270) to head (374062e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...g/screens/projects/NIMServiceModal/NoAuthAlert.tsx	33.33%	2 Missing ⚠️
...projects/NIMServiceModal/ManageNIMServingModal.tsx	88.88%	1 Missing ⚠️
...rving/screens/projects/kServeModal/NoAuthAlert.tsx	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3694      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.16%   84.14%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        1453     1455       +2     
  Lines       33865    33881      +16     
  Branches     9384     9395      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits        28504    28510       +6     
- Misses       5361     5371      +10     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
frontend/src/k8sTypes.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...tend/src/pages/clusterSettings/ClusterSettings.tsx	93.33% <100.00%> (ø)
...s/clusterSettings/ModelServingPlatformSettings.tsx	86.00% <100.00%> (+0.28%)	⬆️
...jects/kServeModal/KServeDeploymentModeDropdown.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...screens/projects/kServeModal/ManageKServeModal.tsx	94.26% <100.00%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
...d/src/pages/modelServing/screens/projects/utils.ts	93.33% <100.00%> (ø)
.../src/pages/modelServing/useKServeDeploymentMode.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...projects/NIMServiceModal/ManageNIMServingModal.tsx	87.59% <88.88%> (+0.18%)	⬆️
...rving/screens/projects/kServeModal/NoAuthAlert.tsx	66.66% <66.66%> (ø)
...g/screens/projects/NIMServiceModal/NoAuthAlert.tsx	33.33% <33.33%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3167270...374062e. Read the comment docs.

[christianvogt]

Having an onClose callback makes more sense because the boolean param is never set to anything other than false.

Suggested change

	export const NoAuthAlert: React.FC<{ setAlertVisible: (isVisible: boolean) => void }> = ({
	export const NoAuthAlert: React.FC<{ onClose: () => void }> = ({

[christianvogt]

@emilys314 do you need to wait on the dependent operator PR to merge first? If so, put this PR on hold until then.

[emilys314]

/hold