Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add workflow for surveys of non-members #5411

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maryliag
Copy link
Contributor

@maryliag maryliag commented Jan 31, 2025

As discusses on a SIG meeting a few weeks back, the Contributor Experience is adding surveys to PRs merged by non-members, to gather info about their experiences. We're starting to add to a couple of repos for testing. This PR adds to this repo.

An example of this message can be found here

As discusses on a SIG meeting a few weeks back, the Contributor Experience is adding
surveys to PRs merged by non-members, to gather info about their experiences. We're
starting to add to a couple of repos for testing. This PR adds to this repo.

An example of this message can be found here: open-telemetry/opentelemetry.io#6099 (comment)
@maryliag maryliag requested a review from a team as a code owner January 31, 2025 19:49
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.79%. Comparing base (f9fda8b) to head (f25b40d).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5411      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.65%   94.79%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files         317      310       -7     
  Lines        8025     7969      -56     
  Branches     1687     1679       -8     
==========================================
- Hits         7596     7554      -42     
+ Misses        429      415      -14     

see 28 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Contributor

@trentm trentm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

+1 to Nev's suggestion to add the @${USERNAME} to the message if possible.

@maryliag
Copy link
Contributor Author

maryliag commented Feb 5, 2025

username added 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants