-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 858
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
make extended tracer easier to use #6943
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6943 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 89.95% 89.94% -0.01%
- Complexity 6635 6636 +1
============================================
Files 745 745
Lines 20010 20010
Branches 1962 1962
============================================
- Hits 17999 17998 -1
Misses 1415 1415
- Partials 596 597 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@jack-berg please check |
up to @jack-berg, but I'd suggest landing #6944 first without adding any new complications |
What do you think about adding a sample of usage in ExtendedTraceApiUsageTest ? |
good idea - done |
@@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ static SdkTracer create( | |||
: new SdkTracer(sharedState, instrumentationScopeInfo, tracerConfig); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
/** | |||
* Note that {@link ExtendedSdkTracer#spanBuilder(String)} calls this and depends on it returning | |||
* {@link ExtendedSdkTracer} in all cases when the incubator is present. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Merged main, and added some additional tests to confirm this.
No description provided.