Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Basic Reason support #445

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Basic Reason support #445

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

vasilisp
Copy link
Contributor

This PR provides very rough and mostly untested Reason support.

I added a -reason flag to our compiler wrappers. It is implemented by calling refmt as a preprocessor.

There is a new basic.reason template that uses Reason syntax.

@vasilisp
Copy link
Contributor Author

vasilisp commented Dec 12, 2016

There is a problem (reported by @dannywillems) with type-checking client values, and probably injections. It is because the new preprocessing pipeline introduces unpredictable intermediate filenames, impacting our auto-generated names for client fragments. To be fixed tomorrow.

@@ -362,6 +364,12 @@ let get_ppopts ~impl_intf file =
type_opt impl_intf file @ !ppopt

let preprocess_opt ?(ocaml = false) ?kind opts =
let refmt () =
if !use_refmt then
[ "-pp" ; "refmt -parse re -print ml" ]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we try to provide a clean failure when reason is not installed ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@vasilisp vasilisp Dec 13, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably. We just need to look for refmt (the only thing we really need) at the time -reason is provided.

Edit: that turns out to be quite complicated, and the compiler itself prints a reasonable message about refmt failing. So, not a priority right now.

@Drup
Copy link
Member

Drup commented Dec 13, 2016

Nice work!

@vasilisp
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Drup, does e706f1d look line a sane approach?

@vasilisp
Copy link
Contributor Author

See #504.

@vasilisp vasilisp closed this Jun 27, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants