Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libobs: Add Flatpak commit logging #11788

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tytan652
Copy link
Collaborator

@tytan652 tytan652 commented Jan 29, 2025

Description

This can allow to determinate the origin of a Flatpak build

Motivation and Context

This PR is meant to allow the loganalyzer (if provided with ostree commit hashes) to see if the build is one that we pushed to Flathub or Flathub Beta.

How Has This Been Tested?

Not tested, I need the CI artifact to do so. Artifacts logs the commit hash as expected

Types of changes

  • Tweak (non-breaking change to improve existing functionality)

Checklist:

  • My code has been run through clang-format.
  • I have read the contributing document.
  • My code is not on the master branch.
  • The code has been tested.
  • All commit messages are properly formatted and commits squashed where appropriate.
  • I have included updates to all appropriate documentation.

@tytan652 tytan652 added Seeking Testers Build artifacts on CI Enhancement Improvement to existing functionality Linux Affects Linux labels Jan 29, 2025
Copy link
Member

@RytoEX RytoEX left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commit message:

  • determinate -> determine

This can allow to determine the origin of a Flatpak build
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement Improvement to existing functionality Linux Affects Linux Seeking Testers Build artifacts on CI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants