-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Meeting 2025-01-09 #667
Meeting 2025-01-09 #667
Conversation
sthagen
commented
Jan 8, 2025
•
edited
Loading
edited
- pre-meeting draft
- correct links to previous minutes
- aligned with agenda
- post-meeting draft
- ready for review
We lacked quorum, so no business, but the minutes are an offer to document who was present and that no busincess was conducted. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, Stefan! I guess next month will also be meeting 95.
I think we can do either way. At OASIS, I have made good experiences with numbering all meetings to expose no gaps, but eventually some meetings are informative only, as this way it is clear that all typical slots have minutes / traces (esp. in TCs that suffered from sparse but peridoic participation often failing to achieve quorum in subsequent meetings). Duplicating meeting numbers or not minuting unquorate meetings have confusion or "chain of custody" issues. |