refactor: removed docgen by inlining it into the Makefile #630
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mrcjkb
requested changes
Feb 11, 2025
teto
commented
Feb 11, 2025
teto
force-pushed
the
teto/move-docgen-to-vimcats
branch
from
372525a to
9e2cce2
Compare
this feels less magical, I was wondering what was this 'docgen' program. My starting problem was that I wanted to run the doc generator from nixpkgs as well, which was harder before this PR
teto
force-pushed
the
teto/move-docgen-to-vimcats
branch
from
9e2cce2 to
738c4a9
Compare
mrcjkb
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this feels less magical, I was wondering what was this 'docgen' program. My starting problem was that I wanted to run the doc generator from nixpkgs as well, which was harder before this PR