fix: missing checks and coverage improvements #6
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates enhance the application's functionality and robustness by refining method signatures, adding validation checks, and improving error handling. Key changes include the addition of an Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant MsgServer
participant Keeper
participant BankKeeper
User->>MsgServer: Initiate deposit
MsgServer->>Keeper: Validate amount
Keeper->>BankKeeper: Process transaction
BankKeeper-->>Keeper: Confirm transaction
Keeper-->>MsgServer: Success response
MsgServer-->>User: Confirm deposit
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
x/halo/keeper/msg_server_aggregator.go (1)
77-79: Negative prices are not acceptable forSetNextPrice. The logic inSetNextPriceshould ensure thatmsg.NextPriceis positive, as indicated by existing validation logic and test cases. The following locations confirm this requirement:
x/halo/types/aggregator/msgs.go: TheValidateBasicmethod checks for zeroNextPrice.x/halo/keeper/msg_server_aggregator_test.go: Test cases expect errors for zero or negativeNextPrice.Please ensure the logic in
SetNextPricecorrectly enforces this constraint.Analysis chain
Verify the logic change in
SetNextPrice.The change now allows negative prices by only checking if
msg.NextPriceis positive. This might be intentional, but ensure that negative prices are acceptable in your application's context.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and handling of negative prices throughout the codebase. # Test: Search for any logic that might be impacted by negative prices. rg --type go 'NextPrice' -A 5Length of output: 71808
x/halo/keeper/msg_server_entitlements.go (1)
48-51: Discrepancy in Role Definitions: Update RequiredThe
Role_valuemap inentitlements.pb.godoes not include all roles defined in the.protofile. Specifically,ROLE_FUND_ADMINandROLE_LIQUIDITY_PROVIDERare missing from the map. This suggests that the Go code might need to be regenerated to reflect the latest role definitions.
- Ensure that the Go code is regenerated from the updated
.protofile to include all role definitions.Analysis chain
Check role existence validation.
The role existence check in
SetRoleCapabilityensures that only valid roles are used. Confirm that theentitlements.Role_valuemap is up-to-date with all possible roles.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all roles are defined in the `entitlements.Role_value` map. # Test: Search for role definitions to ensure all roles are accounted for. rg --type go 'Role_value' -A 5Length of output: 1920
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the .proto file that defines the roles to ensure all roles are accounted for. rg --type proto 'enum Role' -A 10Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all .proto files and search for the 'enum Role' definition. fd --extension proto --exec rg 'enum Role' -A 10 {}Length of output: 316
x/halo/keeper/keeper.go (1)
Missing
interfaceRegistryparameter inNewKeepercallThe
NewKeeperfunction call inutils/mocks/halo.godoes not include theinterfaceRegistryparameter, which is required after the recent changes to the constructor. Please update this call to include the necessary parameter.
- File:
utils/mocks/halo.goAnalysis chain
Line range hint
35-46:
Constructor update forNewKeeperis correct.The addition of
interfaceRegistryto the constructor is consistent with the struct changes. Verify that all calls toNewKeeperare updated to include this new parameter.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all calls to `NewKeeper` include the new `interfaceRegistry` parameter. # Test: Search for the usage of `NewKeeper` in the codebase. rg --type go 'NewKeeper'Length of output: 310
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract lines around `NewKeeper` calls to verify parameters. rg --type go --context 2 'NewKeeper' simapp/app.go utils/mocks/halo.goLength of output: 1077
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (13)
- simapp/app.go (1 hunks)
- utils/mocks/bank.go (4 hunks)
- utils/mocks/halo.go (1 hunks)
- x/halo/keeper/keeper.go (4 hunks)
- x/halo/keeper/msg_server.go (8 hunks)
- x/halo/keeper/msg_server_aggregator.go (1 hunks)
- x/halo/keeper/msg_server_aggregator_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/halo/keeper/msg_server_entitlements.go (4 hunks)
- x/halo/keeper/msg_server_entitlements_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/halo/keeper/msg_server_test.go (10 hunks)
- x/halo/keeper/query_server_entitlements_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/halo/keeper/state_entitlements.go (1 hunks)
- x/halo/types/entitlements/errors.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
golangci-lint
x/halo/keeper/query_server_entitlements_test.go
118-118: ineffectual assignment to res
(ineffassign)
161-161: ineffectual assignment to res
(ineffassign)
x/halo/keeper/msg_server_test.go
549-549: ineffectual assignment to err
(ineffassign)
Additional comments not posted (31)
x/halo/types/entitlements/errors.go (1)
12-13: New error constants added.The addition of
ErrInvalidRoleandErrInvalidMethodimproves error granularity and aligns with existing error handling practices.Ensure that these new error constants are used appropriately throughout the codebase.
Verification successful
New error constants are correctly utilized in the codebase.
The error constants
ErrInvalidRoleandErrInvalidMethodare used appropriately in both implementation and test files, confirming their integration into the error handling logic.
Usage in Implementation:
x/halo/keeper/msg_server_entitlements.gouses both constants to wrap errors with specific messages.Usage in Tests:
x/halo/keeper/msg_server_entitlements_test.goverifies these errors, ensuring they are correctly triggered.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of new error constants in the codebase. # Test: Search for usage of `ErrInvalidRole`. Expect: Instances where this error is used. rg --type go 'ErrInvalidRole' # Test: Search for usage of `ErrInvalidMethod`. Expect: Instances where this error is used. rg --type go 'ErrInvalidMethod'Length of output: 1881
utils/mocks/halo.go (1)
42-45: Enhanced function with registry parameter.The addition of the
registryparameter inHaloKeeperWithKeepersimproves flexibility by allowing interface registration. The change to usebank.Restrictionstandardizes send coins restriction logic.Verify that the
registryparameter is correctly integrated and utilized in other parts of the codebase.utils/mocks/bank.go (2)
Line range hint
19-33:
Simplified method signatures.The
BurnCoinsandMintCoinsmethods have been simplified by removing the unusedctxparameter, improving readability.
60-62: New send restriction function added.The
FailingSendRestrictionFnfunction introduces error-based restrictions, enhancing flexibility in send restrictions.Verify that this new function is used appropriately and tested in the codebase.
Verification successful
Usage of
FailingSendRestrictionFnis appropriately tested.The
FailingSendRestrictionFnfunction is integrated into the test casesTestDepositForWithRestrictionsandTestMintWithRestrictions, ensuring its behavior is validated under restricted conditions. This confirms that the function is used and tested as intended.
x/halo/keeper/msg_server_test.go:
TestDepositForWithRestrictionsTestMintWithRestrictionsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of the `FailingSendRestrictionFn` in the codebase. # Test: Search for instances where `FailingSendRestrictionFn` is used. Expect: Instances where this function is applied. rg --type go 'FailingSendRestrictionFn'Length of output: 327
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check how `FailingSendRestrictionFn` is used in test cases within `msg_server_test.go`. # Search for test functions in `msg_server_test.go` to see how `FailingSendRestrictionFn` is used. rg --type go -A 10 'func Test' x/halo/keeper/msg_server_test.goLength of output: 5191
x/halo/keeper/msg_server_entitlements.go (2)
79-82: Validate role check consistency.The role existence check in
SetUserRolemirrors the logic inSetRoleCapability. Ensure that this validation is consistently applied across all relevant functions.
28-31: Ensure method validation logic is comprehensive.The validation logic in
SetPublicCapabilitychecks if the method is "transfer" or starts with "/halo". Verify that these conditions are sufficient and align with your application's security requirements.x/halo/keeper/state_entitlements.go (1)
75-75: Initialization ofpublicCapabilities.The explicit initialization of
publicCapabilitiesensures that the map is not nil, preventing potential nil reference errors. This is a good practice for robustness.x/halo/keeper/keeper.go (1)
23-25: Integration ofinterfaceRegistrylooks good.The addition of
interfaceRegistryenhances theKeeperstruct's capabilities. Ensure that this new dependency is correctly integrated and utilized throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Integration of
interfaceRegistryis correctly implemented.The
interfaceRegistryis effectively integrated and utilized across the codebase, including in method resolution and application setup.
x/halo/keeper/msg_server_entitlements.go: Used for resolving methods.simapp/app.go: Integrated into application initialization and service registration.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `interfaceRegistry` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `interfaceRegistry` within the codebase. rg --type go 'interfaceRegistry'Length of output: 1034
x/halo/keeper/msg_server_aggregator_test.go (1)
29-37: Enhanced test robustness withLastRoundIDKeyhandling.The changes improve the robustness of the
TestReportBalanceby verifying behavior whenLastRoundIDKeyis manipulated. The logic for saving and restoring the key is well-implemented.x/halo/keeper/msg_server.go (8)
35-37: Validation Check for Positive Amounts.The addition of a validation check for positive amounts in the
Depositfunction is a good practice. It ensures that only valid transactions are processed.
63-65: Validation Check for Positive Amounts.The validation check for positive amounts in the
DepositForfunction is a necessary addition to prevent invalid transactions.
82-84: Validation Check for Positive Amounts.The validation check for positive amounts in the
Withdrawfunction enhances the robustness of the transaction handling.
114-116: Validation Check for Positive Amounts.The validation check for positive amounts in the
WithdrawTofunction is a valuable addition for ensuring transaction validity.
160-162: Validation Check for Positive Amounts.The validation check for positive amounts in the
Burnfunction is crucial for preventing invalid burn operations.
183-185: Validation Check for Positive Amounts.The validation check for positive amounts in the
BurnForfunction is an important enhancement for ensuring correctness.
210-212: Validation Check for Positive Amounts.The validation check for positive amounts in the
Mintfunction is a necessary addition to ensure only valid minting operations occur.
237-239: Validation Check for Positive Amounts.The validation check for positive amounts in the
TradeToFiatfunction is a good practice to ensure valid trades.simapp/app.go (1)
157-157: Addition ofinterfaceRegistrytoHaloKeeperInitialization.The inclusion of
interfaceRegistryas a parameter in theHaloKeeperinitialization improves the integration and management of interfaces. Ensure that all dependencies and interactions withHaloKeeperare updated accordingly.Verification successful
HaloKeeper Initialization with
interfaceRegistryis Correctly UpdatedThe
interfaceRegistryparameter has been correctly added to theHaloKeeperinitialization insimapp/app.go. All interactions withHaloKeeperhave been updated to include this parameter as required.
simapp/app.go: TheinterfaceRegistryis passed tohalokeeper.NewKeeper.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `HaloKeeper` to ensure all interactions are updated for the new `interfaceRegistry` parameter. # Test: Search for `HaloKeeper` usage. Expect: All occurrences should be updated with `interfaceRegistry`. rg --type go 'HaloKeeper'Length of output: 3758
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of `halokeeper.NewKeeper` to check its parameters. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewKeeper($_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_) *Keeper'Length of output: 1094
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of `halokeeper.NewKeeper` in `simapp/app.go` to verify if `interfaceRegistry` is passed. rg --type go 'halokeeper.NewKeeper' simapp/app.go -A 5Length of output: 426
x/halo/keeper/msg_server_entitlements_test.go (3)
119-192: Comprehensive Testing forSetPublicCapability.The
TestEntitlementsPublicCapabilitiesfunction provides thorough coverage of various scenarios for theSetPublicCapabilitymethod. It effectively tests for ownership, signer validity, method validity, and capability settings.
194-296: Robust Testing forSetUserRole.The
TestEntitlementsUserRolesfunction ensures comprehensive validation of theSetUserRolemethod. It covers ownership checks, signer validity, role validity, and user role management.
298-393: Extensive Testing forSetRoleCapability.The
TestEntitlementsUserCapabilityfunction provides detailed testing for theSetRoleCapabilitymethod. It validates ownership, signer validity, role and method existence, and capability management.x/halo/keeper/msg_server_test.go (10)
75-81: LGTM!The test for negative deposit amounts correctly expects an error due to invalid input.
175-182: LGTM!The test for negative deposit-for amounts is correctly expecting an error due to invalid input.
201-241: LGTM!The test for deposit-for operations with restrictions is correctly implemented and expects the appropriate error.
368-381: LGTM!The test for negative withdrawal amounts is correctly expecting an error due to invalid input.
548-561: LGTM!The test for negative withdraw-to amounts is correctly expecting an error due to invalid input.
Tools
golangci-lint
549-549: ineffectual assignment to err
(ineffassign)
705-711: LGTM!The test for negative burn amounts is correctly expecting an error due to invalid input.
775-782: LGTM!The test for negative burn-for amounts is correctly expecting an error due to invalid input.
840-847: LGTM!The test for negative mint amounts is correctly expecting an error due to invalid input.
861-881: LGTM!The test for mint operations with restrictions is correctly implemented and expects the appropriate error.
944-951: LGTM!The test for negative trade-to-fiat amounts is correctly expecting an error due to invalid input.
johnletey
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- utils/mocks/bank.go (4 hunks)
- x/halo/keeper/keeper.go (4 hunks)
- x/halo/keeper/msg_server_entitlements.go (4 hunks)
- x/halo/keeper/msg_server_test.go (10 hunks)
- x/halo/keeper/query_server_entitlements_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- utils/mocks/bank.go
- x/halo/keeper/keeper.go
- x/halo/keeper/msg_server_entitlements.go
- x/halo/keeper/msg_server_test.go
- x/halo/keeper/query_server_entitlements_test.go
Co-authored-by: John Letey <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- utils/mocks/bank.go (4 hunks)
- utils/mocks/halo.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- utils/mocks/bank.go
- utils/mocks/halo.go
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
HaloKeeperfunctionality with improved interface management.BankKeeper.Bug Fixes
Tests