-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FreeSurfer execution when both T2w and FLAIR present #297
Comments
This is a good point, and something to consider if/when there is any references to refer to. For the time being - if you want to force the usage of FLAIR over T2w, you could use |
In any event, taking the higher resolution (where |
Our T2w and FLAIR are precisely the same resolution 🤡 |
These seem relevant:
|
What would you like to see added in fMRIPrep?
When both T2w and FLAIR acquisitions are present (both high resolution isotropic) in the input session, it is necessary to select which to provide to FreeSurfer
recon-all
, given that it only supports one additional contrast. In conversation with @effigies it seems that in this instance the T2w image is given precedence (best I could find is here, but developers will know the relevant location in up-to-date code).However I seem to recall that the recommendation is that where another modality can be used to augment FreeSurfer, FLAIR images are preferable to T2w (as long as they are of sufficient resolution), as they provide better pial surface contrast and that's where the T1w struggles. Unfortunately I'm struggling to find a good online reference stating such; maybe others might recall where such a statement has been made publicly?
Nevertheless wanted to list so that it doesn't get forgotten.
Do you have any interest in helping implement the feature?
Yes, but I would need guidance
Additional information / screenshots
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: