spec: add missing At context rules
#133
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Also allow evaluation/reduction of the index operand of an `At` expression when the array operand is not an lvalue expression. * add an `As` pattern to both `E` and `L` that admits alls `val` in the array operand position * add two tests, one covering the `(As val le)` case and one the `(As val e)` case
saem
approved these changes
Mar 22, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Also allow evaluation/reduction of the index operand of an
Atexpression when the array operand is not an lvalue expression.
Details
Aspattern to bothEandFthat admits allvalin thearray operand position
(As val le)case and one the(As val e)caseNotes For Reviewers
As) #122