Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Semi structured v2 #32

Open
wants to merge 39 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Semi structured v2 #32

wants to merge 39 commits into from

Conversation

ilmarkov
Copy link

Add cusparseLt semi structured matmul wrappers.

Supports fp16, bf16, int8 and fp8 data types.

Benchmark results

Results single layer matmul benchmarks for layers sizes of Llama-2-7b-hf-TP1:

size cutlass_i8_i8_matmul_scaled cusparseLt_i8_i8_2_4 cusparseLt_i8_i8_2_4_scaled cutlass_fp8_fp8_matmul_scaled cusparseLt_fp8_fp8_2_4 cusparseLt_fp8_fp8_2_4_scaled
MKN=(1024x4096x12288) 135.8 53.9 60.4 121.9 57.2 108.9
MKN=(1024x4096x4096) 62.6 21.1 26.1 58.8 21.5 44.4
MKN=(1024x4096x22016) 227.9 89.8 96.3 195.9 100.3 186.4
MKN=(1024x11008x4096) 104.5 45.2 50.8 99.7 49.1 68.1

WIP, end-to-end fp8 model returns gibberish.


PR Checklist (Click to Expand)

Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.

PR Title and Classification

Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:

  • [Bugfix] for bug fixes.
  • [CI/Build] for build or continuous integration improvements.
  • [Doc] for documentation fixes and improvements.
  • [Model] for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.
  • [Frontend] For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server, LLM class, etc.)
  • [Kernel] for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.
  • [Core] for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g., LLMEngine, AsyncLLMEngine, Scheduler, etc.)
  • [Hardware][Vendor] for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g., [Hardware][AMD]).
  • [Misc] for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.

Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.

Code Quality

The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:

  • We adhere to Google Python style guide and Google C++ style guide.
  • Pass all linter checks. Please use format.sh to format your code.
  • The code need to be well-documented to ensure future contributors can easily understand the code.
  • Include sufficient tests to ensure the project to stay correct and robust. This includes both unit tests and integration tests.
  • Please add documentation to docs/source/ if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user understand and utilize the new features or changes.

Adding or changing kernels

Each custom kernel needs a schema and one or more implementations to be registered with PyTorch.

  • Make sure custom ops are registered following PyTorch guidelines: Custom C++ and CUDA Operators and The Custom Operators Manual
  • Custom operations that return Tensors require meta-functions. Meta-functions should be implemented and registered in python so that dynamic dims can be handled automatically. See above documents for a description of meta-functions.
  • Use torch.libary.opcheck() to test the function registration and meta-function for any registered ops. See tests/kernels for examples.
  • When changing the C++ signature of an existing op, the schema must be updated to reflect the changes.
  • If a new custom type is needed, see the following document: Custom Class Support in PT2.

Notes for Large Changes

Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with rfc-required and might not go through the PR.

What to Expect for the Reviews

The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:

  • After the PR is submitted, the PR will be assigned to a reviewer. Every reviewer will pick up the PRs based on their expertise and availability.
  • After the PR is assigned, the reviewer will provide status update every 2-3 days. If the PR is not reviewed within 7 days, please feel free to ping the reviewer or the vLLM team.
  • After the review, the reviewer will put an action-required label on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.
  • Please respond to all comments within a reasonable time frame. If a comment isn't clear or you disagree with a suggestion, feel free to ask for clarification or discuss the suggestion.

Thank You

Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!

youkaichao and others added 30 commits November 12, 2024 14:34
…age embeddings input with varied resolutions (vllm-project#10221)

Signed-off-by: imkero <[email protected]>
…ht/dse-qwen2-2b-mrl-v1 (vllm-project#9944)

Signed-off-by: FurtherAI <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: FurtherAI <[email protected]>
Removed cmake check for cusparseLt, needs to be reverted when the cmake issue is resolved.
@ilmarkov ilmarkov requested a review from bnellnm November 13, 2024 11:55
Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.
Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can do one of these:

  • Add ready label to the PR
  • Enable auto-merge.

🚀

Comment on lines +711 to +733
def semi_structured_fp8_compress(input: torch.Tensor) -> torch.Tensor:
assert input.dtype == torch.float8_e4m3fn
return torch.ops._C.cslt_compress_fp8_semi_structured(input)


def semi_structured_mm(
A_compressed: torch.Tensor,
B_dense: torch.Tensor,
scale: Optional[float] = None,
bias: Optional[torch.Tensor] = None,
out_dtype: Optional[torch.dtype] = None) -> torch.Tensor:
return torch.ops._C.cslt_mm_semi_structured(A_compressed, B_dense, scale,
bias, out_dtype)


def semi_structured_mm2(
A_compressed: torch.Tensor,
B_dense: torch.Tensor,
scale: Optional[float] = None,
bias: Optional[torch.Tensor] = None,
out_dtype: Optional[torch.dtype] = None) -> torch.Tensor:
return torch.ops._C.cslt_mm_semi_structured2(A_compressed, B_dense, scale,
bias, out_dtype)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please make sure to add fake/meta functions for these ops (see @register_fake in this file for examples). Some opcheck tests would be good as well. See tests/kernels/test_marlin_gemm.py for an example of an opcheck test.

Let me know if you need any help with either of these.

Copy link
Member

@bnellnm bnellnm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like some of these changes are from upstream and not related to your PR? I think you need to change your upstream to vllm/main (not neuralmagic/vllm/main) so that it is more obvious what changes are coming from this PR.

Comment on lines +326 to +338
ops.def("cslt_compress_fp8_semi_structured(Tensor! input) -> Tensor");
ops.impl("cslt_compress_fp8_semi_structured", torch::kCUDA,
&cslt_compress_fp8_semi_structured);

ops.def(
"cslt_mm_semi_structured(Tensor! compressed_A, Tensor! denseB,"
"Tensor!? scale, Tensor!? bias, ScalarType!? output_dtype) -> Tensor");
ops.impl("cslt_mm_semi_structured", torch::kCUDA, &cslt_mm_semi_structured);

ops.def(
"cslt_mm_semi_structured2(Tensor! compressed_A, Tensor! denseB,"
"Tensor!? scale, Tensor!? bias, ScalarType!? output_dtype) -> Tensor");
ops.impl("cslt_mm_semi_structured2", torch::kCUDA, &cslt_mm_semi_structured2);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do these ops all modify their all inputs?

Comment on lines +340 to +341
ops.def("cslt_clear_cache() -> ()");
ops.impl("cslt_clear_cache", &cslt_clear_cache);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this op takes no arguments and doesn't return anything you can just do: ops.def("cslt_clear_cache", &cslt_clear_cache);

using cacheID = std::tuple<int64_t, int64_t, int64_t, at::ScalarType,
at::ScalarType, int, int, int>;

std::map<cacheID, cusparseLtEntry> cusparseLt_cache;
Copy link
Member

@bnellnm bnellnm Dec 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ideally the cache entries could be turned into pytorch custom objects but those are not currently supported by the inductor.

We might also be able to subclass torch.Tensor (see https://pytorch.org/docs/main/notes/extending.html#subclassing-torch-tensor) and add an extra opaque field that contains the cache entry. Or use a Tensor for storage of all the cache entry fields. This might be tricky to get right with torch.compile so it might be worth investigating as a follow up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.