Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[doc, Q1'25-CQH] synthetic benchmarks documentation updates #12812

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ssavenko-near
Copy link
Contributor

Clarifies usage and some gotchas I encountered while getting acquainted with the tool

@ssavenko-near ssavenko-near changed the title synthetic benchmarks documentation updates [doc, Q1'25-CQH] synthetic benchmarks documentation updates Jan 28, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.45%. Comparing base (5581f65) to head (911433a).
Report is 10 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #12812      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.46%   70.45%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         847      847              
  Lines      175138   175001     -137     
  Branches   175138   175001     -137     
==========================================
- Hits       123416   123304     -112     
+ Misses      46463    46441      -22     
+ Partials     5259     5256       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
backward-compatibility 0.16% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
db-migration 0.16% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
genesis-check 1.41% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
linux 70.06% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
linux-nightly 70.10% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
pytests 1.70% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
sanity-checks 1.52% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
unittests 70.29% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
upgradability 0.20% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants