Add @cwasm/openbsd-bcrypt and @cwasm/openwall-bcrypt to benchmark

[LinusU]

Hello!

I've spent the last night compiling some bcrypt code to wasm, and wanted to see how they held up against the Rust implementation. This PR adds two new Npm packages to the BCrypt benchmark: @cwasm/openbsd-bcrypt and @cwasm/openwall-bcrypt.

These are the results on my machine:

@node-rs/bcrypt x 15.42 ops/sec ±0.67% (14 runs sampled)
node bcrypt x 16.93 ops/sec ±0.12% (15 runs sampled)
bcryptjs x 3.69 ops/sec ±0.31% (7 runs sampled)
Async hash round 12 bench suite: Fastest is node bcrypt

@node-rs/bcrypt x 15.48 ops/sec ±0.07% (14 runs sampled)
node bcrypt x 443,290 ops/sec ±0.27% (90 runs sampled)
bcryptjs x 3.69 ops/sec ±0.35% (7 runs sampled)
Async verify bench suite: Fastest is node bcrypt

@node-rs/bcrypt x 4.14 ops/sec ±0.27% (15 runs sampled)
node bcrypt x 4.55 ops/sec ±0.06% (16 runs sampled)
bcryptjs x 3.70 ops/sec ±0.09% (14 runs sampled)
wasm OpenBSD x 3.70 ops/sec ±0.04% (14 runs sampled)
wasm Openwall x 4.12 ops/sec ±0.06% (15 runs sampled)
Hash round 12 bench suite: Fastest is node bcrypt

@node-rs/bcrypt x 2,491,253 ops/sec ±0.29% (98 runs sampled)
node bcrypt x 701,746 ops/sec ±0.44% (96 runs sampled)
bcryptjs x 150,612 ops/sec ±0.32% (94 runs sampled)
wasm OpenBSD x 3,364,578 ops/sec ±0.14% (95 runs sampled)
wasm Openwall x 762,250 ops/sec ±1.75% (88 runs sampled)
genSaltSync bench suite: Fastest is wasm OpenBSD

Seems like the Openwall implementation has 99.5% of the performance of this module, for hashSync! The OpenBSD implementation has the fastest genSaltSync 🐎

[LinusU]

(rebased on main)

ping @Brooooooklyn, any chance of getting this merged?

[LinusU]

(rebased on main)

ping @Brooooooklyn, any chance of getting this merged?