Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update 1 NuGet dependencies #365

Conversation

nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Dec 19, 2024

Bumps nanoFramework.Benchmark from 1.0.81 to 1.0.83

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated the nanoFramework.Benchmark dependency to the latest version, enhancing performance and stability.

Bumps nanoFramework.Benchmark from 1.0.81 to 1.0.83</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves a minor update to the packages.lock.json file for the nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark project. Specifically, the nanoFramework.Benchmark dependency has been upgraded from version 1.0.81 to 1.0.83. This update modifies the requested and resolved versions of the dependency, along with its corresponding content hash. No other dependencies were changed in this update.

Changes

File Change Summary
nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.Benchmark dependency version from 1.0.81 to 1.0.83

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between be0fba0 and 5790f61.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/packages.lock.json (1)

7-9: LGTM! Automated dependency update looks correct.

The update of nanoFramework.Benchmark from 1.0.81 to 1.0.83 is properly reflected in both the requested and resolved versions, along with the corresponding content hash update.

✅ Verification successful

Dependency update verified and properly constrained

The packages.lock.json shows that the nanoFramework.Benchmark update to version 1.0.83 is properly constrained and all other dependencies remain unchanged with their exact version constraints. The update appears to be isolated to just this package, maintaining the integrity of the dependency tree.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify package compatibility and changelog
# Check if there are any breaking changes in the version bump

# Look for changelog or release notes
fd -g "CHANGELOG.md" -g "RELEASES.md" -g "BREAKING-CHANGES.md"

# Check for any dependency version constraints in project files
fd -e csproj -e props | xargs grep -l "nanoFramework.Benchmark"

Length of output: 287


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the package references and changes

# Check for any direct references to nanoFramework.Benchmark in csproj files
rg -l "nanoFramework.Benchmark" -g "*.csproj"

# Look for any other package.lock.json files that might reference this package
rg -l "nanoFramework.Benchmark" -g "packages.lock.json"

# Check the project file containing the dependency to verify version constraints
cat "nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark.csproj"

Length of output: 464


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the packages.lock.json file to understand the full context

# Display the content of packages.lock.json
cat "nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/packages.lock.json"

# Search for any project files in the repository
fd -e csproj

Length of output: 2242


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@josesimoes josesimoes merged commit 434ec52 into main Dec 19, 2024
7 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/35e6c06a-5647-49e4-8451-2f9dcc9d1bc1 branch December 19, 2024 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants