Update 1 NuGet dependencies

[nfbot]

Bumps nanoFramework.Benchmark from 1.0.78 to 1.0.80

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the nanoFramework.Benchmark dependency to version 1.0.80 for improved performance and features.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updating the version of the nanoFramework.Benchmark dependency in the packages.lock.json file for the nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark project. The version has been upgraded from 1.0.78 to 1.0.80, with corresponding updates to the requested and resolved fields, as well as a new contentHash. All other dependencies remain unchanged.

Changes

File	Change Summary
nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/packages.lock.json	Updated nanoFramework.Benchmark version from 1.0.78 to 1.0.80, with updated requested, resolved, and contentHash fields.

Possibly related PRs

• Update 1 NuGet dependencies #336: Updates the nanoFramework.Benchmark package from version 1.0.68 to 1.0.71.
• Update 1 NuGet dependencies #340: Updates the nanoFramework.Benchmark package from version 1.0.72 to 1.0.73.
• Update 1 NuGet dependencies #343: Updates the nanoFramework.Benchmark package from version 1.0.73 to 1.0.75.
• Update 1 NuGet dependencies #349: Updates the nanoFramework.Benchmark package from version 1.0.76 to 1.0.77.
• Update 1 NuGet dependencies #352: Updates the nanoFramework.Benchmark package from version 1.0.77 to 1.0.78.
• Update 1 NuGet dependencies #355: Updates the nanoFramework.System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch package from version 1.2.660 to 1.2.670.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 09b844c and fbcd777.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)

• nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
• nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/packages.lock.json (1)

7-9: LGTM! Package version update looks correct.

The update of nanoFramework.Benchmark from 1.0.78 to 1.0.80 is properly reflected in the lock file with corresponding hash updates.

Let's verify the package compatibility:

✅ Verification successful

Package update from 1.0.78 to 1.0.80 is safe to proceed

The code inspection shows that nanoFramework.Benchmark is used in a straightforward manner for benchmarking purposes, utilizing standard APIs like BenchmarkRunner, [Benchmark] attribute, and [IterationCount] attribute. The minor version update (1.0.78 to 1.0.80) maintains the same API surface and is used in a way that's compatible with both versions.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any compatibility issues or breaking changes
# between nanoFramework.Benchmark 1.0.78 and 1.0.80

# Look for changelog or release notes
rg -i "changelog|breaking.*changes" -g "*.md"

Length of output: 22489

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the nanoFramework.Benchmark package usage in the codebase
# and look for any potential breaking changes in the version update

# Search for nanoFramework.Benchmark usage
rg -l "nanoFramework.Benchmark"

# Check package references in project files
fd -e csproj -x cat {} \; | rg -i "nanoFramework.Benchmark"

Length of output: 711

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the usage of nanoFramework.Benchmark in the benchmark project
# to verify compatibility with the version update

# Check the benchmark implementation files
cat nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/TypeBenchmarks.cs
cat nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/Program.cs

# Check package reference details
cat nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark.nfproj

Length of output: 8439

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.