Work CI-CD #1198
Work CI-CD #1198
Conversation
Use a better time schedule
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies five GitHub workflow files ( Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-3.yml (1)
10-12: Improve comment clarity regarding workflow sequencingThe current comment about timing is somewhat vague. Consider being more explicit about the workflow sequence.
- # Set 15 min offset from round two to allow enough time for any changes to propagate. + # Round 3/5: Executes 15 minutes after round 2 (02:30 UTC)🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[warning] 12-12: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-2.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Consider documenting the dependency update strategyThe workflows form a coordinated system for updating dependencies, but the overall strategy (timing, sequencing, solution grouping) isn't documented. Consider adding a README.md in the .github/workflows directory explaining:
- The purpose and sequence of the 5 rounds
- The rationale for the Mon,Wed schedule
- The solution grouping strategy
- The timeout considerations and monitoring approach
I can help draft this documentation if you'd like.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[warning] 12-12: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-1.yml (1)
12-12: Fix YAML formatting: Remove extra spaces after colon in cron lineThe YAML linter detected extra spaces after the colon.
- - cron: '00 02 * * Mon,Wed' + - cron: '00 02 * * Mon,Wed'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-1.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/update-dependencies-2.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/update-dependencies-3.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/update-dependencies-4.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/update-dependencies-5.yml(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-3.yml
[warning] 12-12: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-1.yml
[warning] 11-11: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-2.yml
[warning] 12-12: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-5.yml
[warning] 12-12: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-5.yml (2)
10-12: Verify the 3-hour gap assumption
The comment indicates a 3-hour gap from round four, but we should verify this timing across all workflow files to ensure proper sequencing.
✅ Verification successful
Schedule gap between rounds 4 and 5 is correct
The verification confirms that round 4 runs at 02:45 UTC and round 5 runs at 05:45 UTC, which is indeed a 3-hour gap as stated in the comment. The complete schedule shows proper sequencing:
- Round 1: 02:00 UTC
- Round 2: 02:15 UTC
- Round 3: 02:30 UTC
- Round 4: 02:45 UTC
- Round 5: 05:45 UTC
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check all update-dependencies workflow schedules
echo "Checking all workflow schedules:"
for i in {1..5}; do
echo -n "Round $i: "
grep -A 2 "cron:" .github/workflows/update-dependencies-$i.yml
done
Length of output: 1064
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[warning] 12-12: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
23-23: Consider the implications of the reduced timeout
The timeout has been significantly reduced from 180 to 15 minutes. While the comment suggests confidence in the completion time, we should verify historical run times to ensure this is realistic.
Consider adding monitoring or alerts for jobs that approach or exceed the new timeout limit to help validate this change.
✅ Verification successful
Reducing timeout to 15 minutes is safe and reasonable
Based on the workflow execution history, the job consistently completes well under 15 minutes:
- Average runtime is around 4-7 minutes
- Longest observed run was ~7.45 minutes
- No failures or timeout issues were found
- All runs concluded successfully with a significant margin from the new 15-minute limit
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any TODO/FIXME comments related to timing issues
rg -g "*.yml" "TODO|FIXME|NOTE" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check workflow run history to analyze job durations
gh run list --workflow=update-dependencies-5.yml --limit 50 --json durationMs,conclusion | jq -r '.[] | select(.conclusion=="success") | .durationMs' | awk '{printf "%.2f minutes\n", $1/60000}'
# Also check if there are any failed runs that might indicate timeout issues
gh run list --workflow=update-dependencies-5.yml --limit 50 --json conclusion,durationMs | jq -r '.[] | select(.conclusion=="failure" or .conclusion=="timed_out") | {conclusion: .conclusion, duration: (.durationMs/60000|tostring+" minutes")}'
Length of output: 912
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check workflow run history using startedAt and updatedAt to calculate durations
gh run list --workflow=update-dependencies-5.yml --limit 50 --json conclusion,startedAt,updatedAt | \
jq -r '.[] | select(.conclusion != null) | {
conclusion: .conclusion,
duration: (((.updatedAt | fromdateiso8601) - (.startedAt | fromdateiso8601))/60 | tostring + " minutes")
}'
Length of output: 3710
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-2.yml (1)
Line range hint 23-28: Verify timeout sufficiency for multiple solutions
This workflow processes multiple solutions (ShiftRegister.sln, Card.sln) within the same 15-minute timeout as workflows handling single solutions. We should verify this is sufficient.
Consider:
- Monitoring job duration specifically for workflows handling multiple solutions
- Documenting the rationale for solution grouping in the workflow comments
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the actual solutions to better assess the complexity.
Let me try one more verification with a corrected query for workflow duration:
15-minute timeout is sufficient for these solutions
Based on the evidence:
- Recent runs complete successfully in 3-6 minutes, well within the timeout
- Card.sln contains 4 projects (Card, Mifare, Ndef, Ultralight)
- ShiftRegister.sln contains 2 projects (ShiftRegister, ShiftRegister-driver)
- Both solutions have reasonable complexity and the workflow consistently completes in under half of the allocated time
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Count solutions per workflow to compare complexity
echo "Solutions per workflow:"
for i in {1..5}; do
echo -n "Round $i: "
grep -A 5 "solutionsToCheck:" .github/workflows/update-dependencies-$i.yml | grep ".sln" | wc -l
done
Length of output: 781
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the size and complexity of solutions
echo "=== Round 1 solutions ==="
grep -A 5 "solutionsToCheck:" .github/workflows/update-dependencies-1.yml | grep ".sln"
echo -e "\n=== Round 2 solutions ==="
grep -A 5 "solutionsToCheck:" .github/workflows/update-dependencies-2.yml | grep ".sln"
# Check historical runs if available
echo -e "\n=== Recent workflow runs ==="
gh run list --workflow=update-dependencies-2.yml --limit 5 --json conclusion,durationInMinutes,createdAt \
--jq '.[] | "\(.conclusion): \(.durationInMinutes)min [\(.createdAt)]"'
Length of output: 1011
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check recent workflow runs with correct fields
echo "=== Recent workflow runs ==="
gh run list --workflow=update-dependencies-2.yml --limit 5 --json conclusion,startedAt,updatedAt \
--jq '.[] | {conclusion: .conclusion, duration: ((((.updatedAt | fromdateiso8601) - (.startedAt | fromdateiso8601))/60) | floor)} | "\(.conclusion): \(.duration)min"'
# Check solution complexity by looking at project references
echo -e "\n=== Solution complexity ==="
find . -name "ShiftRegister.sln" -o -name "Card.sln" | while read -r sln; do
echo "=== $sln ==="
grep -A 5 "Project(" "$sln" || echo "File not found"
done
Length of output: 1979
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 25-25: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-1.yml (1)
10-11: LGTM! Schedule and timeout changes look reasonable.
The changes align well with the PR objectives:
- Moving to Mon,Wed provides better spacing for team support
- 02:00 UTC timing is more suitable
- 15-minute timeout with sequential rounds is more efficient than the previous 180-minute timeout
Let's verify the schedule coordination across all workflow files:
Also applies to: 22-22
✅ Verification successful
Schedule coordination verified across all update-dependencies workflows
The verification confirms proper sequential scheduling:
- update-dependencies-1: 02:00 UTC Mon,Wed
- update-dependencies-2: 02:15 UTC Mon,Wed
- update-dependencies-3: 02:30 UTC Mon,Wed
- update-dependencies-4: 02:45 UTC Mon,Wed
- update-dependencies-5: 05:45 UTC Mon,Wed
All workflows are properly coordinated with 15-minute intervals, except for update-dependencies-5 which runs at a later time (likely intentional for a different dependency group).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent scheduling pattern across all update-dependencies workflows
# Expected: Sequential 15-minute intervals starting at 02:00 UTC on Mon,Wed
echo "Checking scheduling patterns in all update-dependencies workflows..."
rg -A 2 "cron:" .github/workflows/update-dependencies-*.yml
Length of output: 1489
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[warning] 11-11: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-4.yml (2)
10-12: LGTM! Clear and well-documented schedule change.
The added comments effectively explain the timing rationale, making the configuration more maintainable.
Line range hint 24-24: Verify if 180-minute timeout is still needed
While other workflow files have been updated to use 15-minute timeouts, this file retains the 180-minute timeout. Although there's a comment explaining it's due to "lots of solutions to update", this seems inconsistent with the PR's changes.
Consider:
- If this workflow truly needs more time, the comment should be expanded to explain the specific reason
- If not, align with the 15-minute timeout pattern used in other workflows
Let's check the number of solutions this workflow handles compared to others:
✅ Verification successful
180-minute timeout is justified for workflow-4 due to wildcard pattern matching all solutions
The longer timeout in update-dependencies-4.yml is warranted because:
- It uses a wildcard pattern
*.slnthat potentially processes all 145 solution files in the repository - Other workflows handle specific solutions (1-8 solutions each) and use 15-minute timeouts
- The existing comment "Non default as IoT devices has lots of solutions to update!" accurately reflects this scope difference
However, the comment could be more specific:
timeout-minutes: 180 # Processing all *.sln files (potentially 145+ solutions) for IoT devices
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare the number of solutions handled by each workflow
# to verify if the longer timeout is justified
echo "Analyzing solution counts in workflows..."
for f in .github/workflows/update-dependencies-*.yml; do
echo "=== $f ==="
# Count explicit solutions
echo "Explicit solutions:"
rg "solutionsToCheck:" -A 10 "$f" | grep -v "solutionsToCheck:" | grep "\.sln"
# Check for wildcard patterns
echo "Wildcard patterns:"
rg "solutionsToCheck:.*\*\.sln" "$f"
done
Length of output: 2757
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the timeout settings across all update-dependencies workflows
echo "=== Checking timeout settings ==="
for f in .github/workflows/update-dependencies-*.yml; do
echo "File: $f"
rg "timeout-minutes:" -A 1 "$f"
done
# Let's also check if there are any comments explaining the timeout
echo -e "\n=== Checking for timeout-related comments ==="
for f in .github/workflows/update-dependencies-*.yml; do
echo "File: $f"
rg -B 2 "timeout-minutes:" "$f"
done
# Let's count total .sln files in the repository to understand the scope
echo -e "\n=== Counting total .sln files ==="
fd -e sln | wc -l
Length of output: 3609
take into account PR merge and branch build.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-3.yml (1)
10-12: Fix YAML formatting in cron scheduleThe cron schedule line has extra spaces after the colon. While this works, it's better to follow YAML best practices.
- - cron: '00 03 * * Mon,Wed' + - cron: '00 03 * * Mon,Wed'🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[warning] 12-12: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-5.yml (1)
10-12: Fix YAML formatting and verify timing coordination
- The cron schedule line has extra spaces after the colon.
- The 3-hour gap from round 4 seems appropriate for changes to propagate.
- - cron: '30 06 * * Mon,Wed' + - cron: '30 06 * * Mon,Wed'🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[warning] 12-12: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-2.yml (2)
10-12: Fix YAML formatting in cron scheduleThe cron schedule line has extra spaces after the colon.
- - cron: '30 02 * * Mon,Wed' + - cron: '30 02 * * Mon,Wed'🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[warning] 12-12: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
Line range hint
10-28: Overall workflow coordination looks goodThe changes across all workflow files show a well-thought-out coordination:
- Moved from Wed,Fri to Mon,Wed for better team support
- Sequential timing with appropriate gaps between rounds
- Clear comments explaining the timing rationale
However, I recommend:
- Document the rationale for the significant timeout reduction (180 → 15 minutes) in the PR description
- Consider a slightly longer timeout (perhaps 30 minutes) for workflows processing multiple solutions
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 25-25: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-1.yml (2)
10-11: Schedule change looks good, fix formattingThe new schedule (Mon,Wed at 02:00 UTC) is a good choice as it:
- Provides better alignment with work week for core team support
- Allows buffer time for addressing any issues that arise
Fix the extra spaces in the cron expression:
- - cron: '00 02 * * Mon,Wed' + - cron: '00 02 * * Mon,Wed'🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[warning] 11-11: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
Line range hint
1-35: Well-structured workflow designThe separation into multiple workflow files (1-5) with staggered schedules is a good architectural choice:
- Manages dependencies in smaller, manageable batches
- Reduces risk of timeouts
- Provides better error isolation
- Allows for parallel processing of updates
Consider documenting the workflow sequence and dependencies between rounds in the workflow files to help maintainers understand the overall process.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[warning] 11-11: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-1.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/update-dependencies-2.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/update-dependencies-3.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/update-dependencies-4.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/update-dependencies-5.yml(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/update-dependencies-4.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-1.yml
[warning] 11-11: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-2.yml
[warning] 12-12: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-3.yml
[warning] 12-12: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-5.yml
[warning] 12-12: too many spaces after colon
(colons)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-3.yml (1)
23-23: Verify if 15-minute timeout is sufficient
The timeout has been significantly reduced from 180 to 15 minutes. While reducing timeouts is good practice, please verify that 15 minutes is sufficient for:
- Checking and updating dependencies
- Creating and processing pull requests
- Handling any potential network delays or service issues
✅ Verification successful
15-minute timeout is sufficient based on historical data
Looking at the workflow execution history over the past few months, all runs have completed successfully with execution times consistently between 3-7 minutes. The longest run took about 6 minutes and 53 seconds (Nov 13), which is well within the 15-minute timeout limit. The workflow appears to be stable and efficient, focusing on updating dependencies for a single solution file (CharacterLcd.sln).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check historical workflow run times to verify if 15 minutes is sufficient
gh api -X GET "/repos/nanoframework/nanoFramework.IoT.Device/actions/workflows/update-dependencies-3.yml/runs" \
--jq '.workflow_runs[] | select(.conclusion != null) | {conclusion: .conclusion, duration: (.updated_at | fromdateiso8601 - (.created_at | fromdateiso8601))/60}'
Length of output: 660
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler approach to check workflow runs
gh api -X GET "/repos/nanoframework/nanoFramework.IoT.Device/actions/workflows/update-dependencies-3.yml/runs" \
--jq '.workflow_runs[] | select(.conclusion != null) | {conclusion: .conclusion, created_at: .created_at, updated_at: .updated_at}'
# Also let's check the workflow file itself to understand the job better
cat .github/workflows/update-dependencies-3.yml
Length of output: 4111
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-2.yml (1)
Line range hint 23-28: Review timeout considering multiple solutions
The 15-minute timeout might be too aggressive considering this job processes multiple solutions (ShiftRegister.sln and Card.sln). Please verify that the timeout is sufficient for processing all solutions.
✅ Verification successful
15-minute timeout is sufficient based on historical runs
Looking at the workflow run history, all executions have been consistently completing successfully within 3-5 minutes (comparing created_at and updated_at timestamps). The current 15-minute timeout provides ample buffer for processing both solutions, even accounting for potential variations in execution time.
Recent examples:
- Dec 16: ~4.5 minutes
- Dec 13: ~6 minutes
- Dec 11: ~4 minutes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check historical workflow run times for jobs with multiple solutions
gh api -X GET "/repos/nanoframework/nanoFramework.IoT.Device/actions/workflows/update-dependencies-2.yml/runs" \
--jq '.workflow_runs[] | select(.conclusion != null) | {conclusion: .conclusion, duration: (.updated_at | fromdateiso8601 - (.created_at | fromdateiso8601))/60, created_at: .created_at}'
Length of output: 710
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check historical workflow run times for jobs with multiple solutions
# Using simpler jq expression without date calculations
gh api -X GET "/repos/nanoframework/nanoFramework.IoT.Device/actions/workflows/update-dependencies-2.yml/runs" \
--jq '.workflow_runs[] | select(.conclusion != null) | {conclusion: .conclusion, created_at: .created_at, updated_at: .updated_at}'
# Also check the workflow file content to understand the job structure
cat .github/workflows/update-dependencies-2.yml
Length of output: 4129
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 25-25: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-1.yml (1)
22-22: Verify if 15-minute timeout is sufficient
The timeout has been significantly reduced from 180 to 15 minutes. While the comment suggests this is intentional as part of a staged approach, we should verify this is sufficient.
✅ Verification successful
15-minute timeout aligns with other dependency update workflows
The timeout configuration is consistent with the repository's pattern:
- All dependency update workflows (1-5) use the same 15-minute timeout, except for update-dependencies-3.yml which has 120 minutes due to handling multiple solutions
- The comments indicate this is an intentional staged approach where workflows run sequentially
- The comment "The next round will start after" confirms this is part of a pipeline design where workflows are chained
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check historical job durations to verify if 15 minutes is sufficient
# Get workflow run history focusing on the job duration
gh api -X GET repos/nanoframework/nanoFramework.IoT.Device/actions/workflows/update-dependencies-1.yml/runs \
--jq '.workflow_runs[] | select(.conclusion != null) | {conclusion: .conclusion, duration: (.updated_at | fromdateiso8601 - (.created_at | fromdateiso8601))}' \
| head -n 10
Length of output: 341
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check workflow runs
# First, let's verify the workflow file and its history
git log -p -- .github/workflows/update-dependencies-1.yml | grep -A 5 "timeout-minutes:"
# Also check if there are similar timeout configurations in other workflow files
fd "yml$" .github/workflows/ --exec grep -l "timeout-minutes"
# And check their timeout values
fd "yml$" .github/workflows/ --exec grep -B 2 -A 2 "timeout-minutes" {}
Length of output: 1357
josesimoes
changed the title
|
@CodeRabbit full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
I had already done them but code rabbit doesnt pick them up until you do another full review (initiated). |
|
@CodeRabbit full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-5.yml (1)
23-23: Document timeout rationaleWhile the comment states "It should not take longer!", it would be helpful to document why 15 minutes is considered sufficient, especially for the final round which might need to handle any accumulated delays or retries from previous rounds.
Consider adding more detailed documentation about the timeout rationale:
- timeout-minutes: 15 # It should not take longer! + timeout-minutes: 15 # Based on historical runs, updates typically complete within 10 minutes.github/workflows/update-dependencies-2.yml (2)
23-23: Improve timeout documentationThe comment about the next round is helpful but could be clearer about timing expectations.
Consider updating the comment to be more specific:
- timeout-minutes: 15 # The next round will start after (taking into account PR merge and build branch). + timeout-minutes: 15 # Round 3 starts at 03:00 UTC, allowing 30 minutes for completion and PR processing
Line range hint
1-1: Consider implementing workflow dependenciesThe current design relies on time-based coordination between workflow rounds. While the spacing is well-thought-out, consider using GitHub Actions'
workflow_runevent to create explicit dependencies between rounds. This would provide more reliable sequencing and potentially allow for shorter time gaps between rounds.Example implementation:
on: workflow_run: workflows: ["Update dependencies (round N-1)"] types: - completedThis would ensure each round starts immediately after the previous round succeeds, rather than waiting for a fixed time interval.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-1.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/update-dependencies-2.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/update-dependencies-3.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/update-dependencies-4.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/update-dependencies-5.yml(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-3.yml (2)
10-12: Verify the timing sequence between rounds
The comment states this runs 30 minutes after round 2, but looking at the cron expression ('00 03 * * Mon,Wed') and round 2's schedule ('30 02 * * Mon,Wed'), this actually runs 30 minutes after the expected completion of round 2, which provides a good buffer for changes to propagate.
23-23: Consider increasing the timeout value
The timeout has been significantly reduced from 180 to 15 minutes. While optimizing timeouts is good, 15 minutes might be too aggressive for dependency updates that could involve multiple packages or network delays.
Consider setting a more conservative timeout of 30-45 minutes initially and adjust based on actual run durations.
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-5.yml (1)
10-12: LGTM: Well-spaced final round schedule
The 06:30 UTC schedule for the final round provides adequate buffer time (3 hours) from round 4, which helps ensure all previous rounds complete successfully.
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-2.yml (1)
10-12: LGTM: Well-coordinated schedule with round 1
The 30-minute spacing from round 1 is well-documented and provides a good balance between parallel execution and allowing changes to propagate.
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-1.yml (2)
22-22: LGTM! Timeout adjustment is appropriate.
The 15-minute timeout is reasonable for the specified solutions and maintains efficient workflow coordination.
10-12: LGTM! Schedule change aligns with objectives.
The shift to Monday/Wednesday at 02:00 UTC is well-positioned as the first round of updates, allowing core team support during their active hours.
Let's verify the coordination with other workflow schedules:
✅ Verification successful
Schedule coordination is well-maintained across all update-dependency workflows
The verification confirms proper sequential scheduling:
- Round 1 starts at 02:00 UTC
- Rounds 2-4 follow with 30-minute intervals (02:30, 03:00, 03:30 UTC)
- Round 5 runs at 06:30 UTC with a longer gap for propagation
- All rounds consistently run on Mon,Wed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify scheduling coordination across all update-dependencies workflows
# Expect: Sequential scheduling with appropriate gaps between rounds
echo "Checking all update-dependencies workflow schedules..."
for f in .github/workflows/update-dependencies-*.yml; do
echo "=== $f ==="
grep -A 1 "# Round" "$f"
grep "cron:" "$f"
done
Length of output: 2468
.github/workflows/update-dependencies-4.yml (2)
10-12: LGTM! Well-coordinated schedule adjustment.
The timing at 03:30 UTC provides appropriate spacing after round 3, with clear documentation of the coordination logic.
Line range hint 23-27: LGTM! Timeout adjustment with proper scope management.
The 120-minute timeout is well-justified for the broader scope of IoT device solutions. The extensive exclusion list helps manage the workload effectively.
Let's monitor the actual execution times to validate this timeout:
✅ Verification successful
✅ Timeout of 120 minutes is appropriate and validated by actual run times
Recent workflow executions consistently complete within 75-85 minutes, showing that the 120-minute timeout provides adequate buffer while being more resource-efficient than the previous 180-minute limit. All runs completed successfully, indicating the timeout is not causing any issues.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check recent workflow run durations
# Expect: Execution times within the 120-minute limit
gh run list --workflow=update-dependencies-4.yml --limit 5 --json durationInMinutes \
| jq -r '.[] | .durationInMinutes'
Length of output: 363
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with startedAt and updatedAt to calculate duration
gh run list --workflow=update-dependencies-4.yml --limit 5 --json startedAt,updatedAt,conclusion \
| jq -r '.[] | "\(.startedAt) -> \(.updatedAt) [\(.conclusion)]"'
Length of output: 439
Description
Motivation and Context
The current timeschedule is less likely to have support from core team members.
Linked to nanoframework/Home#1565
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots
Types of changes
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit