Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade dotenv from 16.1.3 to 16.1.4 #46

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

n1j0
Copy link
Owner

@n1j0 n1j0 commented Jun 29, 2023

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade dotenv from 16.1.3 to 16.1.4.

As this is a private repository, Snyk-bot does not have access. Therefore, this PR has been created automatically, but appears to have been created by a real user.

✨ Snyk has automatically assigned this pull request, set who gets assigned.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 24 days ago, on 2023-06-04.
Release notes
Package name: dotenv from dotenv GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: dotenv

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

👩‍💻 Set who automatically gets assigned

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@n1j0 n1j0 self-assigned this Jun 29, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

Coverage report

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟢 Statements 99.5% 803/807
🟢 Branches 97.22% 140/144
🟢 Functions 99.41% 168/169
🟢 Lines 99.49% 783/787

Test suite run success

283 tests passing in 35 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 7807699

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants