Skip to content

Conversation

@weidankong
Copy link
Contributor

@weidankong weidankong commented Jan 12, 2026

OpenJudge Version

0.2.0

Description

common graders returning 1~5, however threshold defaults to 0.7

Checklist

Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.

  • Code has been formatted with pre-commit run --all-files command
  • All tests are passing
  • Docstrings are in Google style
  • Related documentation has been updated (e.g. links, examples, etc.)
  • Code is ready for review

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @weidankong, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses an inconsistency in the OpenJudge grading system where common graders return scores on a scale of 1 to 5, but their default success threshold was set to 0.7, expecting a 0-1 scale. The changes update the threshold to operate within the 1-5 range, setting the new default to 3, ensuring logical alignment between grader outputs and their evaluation criteria.

Highlights

  • Grader Threshold Adjustment: The default threshold value for several common graders has been updated from '0.7' to '3'.
  • Threshold Range Correction: The documented range for the 'threshold' parameter has been changed from '[0, 1]' to '[1, 5]' to align with the actual scoring mechanism of the graders.
  • Example Updates: Code examples within the documentation for these graders have been modified to reflect the new default threshold value.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly updates the default threshold for several common graders (CorrectnessGrader, HallucinationGrader, HarmfulnessGrader, InstructionFollowingGrader) from 0.7 to 3, aligning with the new 1-5 scoring range. The changes are consistently applied across docstrings, examples, and method signatures.

I've added a few suggestions to improve type consistency for the threshold parameter.

A more significant concern is that some of the corresponding unit tests do not seem to be updated. For instance, in tests/graders/common/test_correctness.py and tests/graders/common/test_harmfulness.py, tests still use old, now invalid, threshold values like 0.7 and 0.8. It is crucial to update these tests to reflect the new logic and ensure the test suite remains valid and effective. Please ensure all related tests are updated as part of this change.

self,
model: BaseChatModel | dict,
threshold: float = 0.7,
threshold: float = 3,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The type hint for threshold is float, but the default value is an integer 3. For consistency and to avoid potential type-related issues, it's better to use a float literal 3.0 as the default value.

Suggested change
threshold: float = 3,
threshold: float = 3.0,

self,
model: BaseChatModel | dict,
threshold: float = 0.7,
threshold: float = 3,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The type hint for threshold is float, but the default value is an integer 3. For consistency and to avoid potential type-related issues, it's better to use a float literal 3.0 as the default value.

Suggested change
threshold: float = 3,
threshold: float = 3.0,

self,
model: BaseChatModel | dict,
threshold: float = 0.7,
threshold: float = 3,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The type hint for threshold is float, but the default value is an integer 3. For consistency and to avoid potential type-related issues, it's better to use a float literal 3.0 as the default value.

Suggested change
threshold: float = 3,
threshold: float = 3.0,

self,
model: BaseChatModel | dict,
threshold: float = 0.7,
threshold: float = 3,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The type hint for threshold is float, but the default value is an integer 3. For consistency and to avoid potential type-related issues, it's better to use a float literal 3.0 as the default value.

Suggested change
threshold: float = 3,
threshold: float = 3.0,

Copy link
Collaborator

@ployts ployts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@helloml0326 helloml0326 merged commit c14c8fd into modelscope:main Jan 13, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants