-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lb2pkg #1
Conversation
For now, additional lineshapes are living in |
It was my issue, I've broken the test on Friday. Should be fixed now |
I think that is right. |
well done!! 👍
It can be done by matching the value of the A simple way to call unpolarized_intensity on a decay chain is |
Welcome to Codecov 🎉Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests. Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️ |
@IlyaSegal have a look to minor updates of json file I've added validation step to tests. It passes now for Lc2ppiK, and fails for your decay. |
I prepared a JSON file and a Julia test file for reading the LbpKg model.
For now, the test failed, throwing an error: ERROR: DomainError with -Inf.
Do you have any suggestions on what can be the reason?
Also, for now, I have excluded non-resonant poles since it is not possible to leave the "parametrization" field empty.
But, probably, I can try to add a function for the non-resonant poles (it is simply an exponent) based on the example of Breit-Wigner.
I inserted all the resonances with the L-S recoupling type. Am I right?
Am I missing something else, what can cause this divergence?
Closes #2