Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reorganization of server documentation #1350

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

miguelgrinberg
Copy link
Owner

@miguelgrinberg miguelgrinberg commented Jun 15, 2024

Long overdue restructuring of the server documentation.

Fixes #1239

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (a2c266c) to head (fc6ddd8).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              main     #1350    +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%            
==========================================
  Files           31        31            
  Lines         2465      2820   +355     
  Branches       436       598   +162     
==========================================
+ Hits          2465      2820   +355     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@miguelgrinberg miguelgrinberg force-pushed the server-docs-reorg branch 2 times, most recently from ddb4aaa to fc6ddd8 Compare June 20, 2024 22:56
@miguelgrinberg miguelgrinberg marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2024 23:11
@miguelgrinberg miguelgrinberg merged commit 3a618c6 into main Jun 20, 2024
37 of 38 checks passed
@miguelgrinberg miguelgrinberg deleted the server-docs-reorg branch June 20, 2024 23:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve deployment documentation to include websocket-only options
2 participants