[rush] Fix implicit phase expansion regression #5209
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dmichon-msft
requested review from
iclanton,
octogonz,
apostolisms and
D4N14L
as code owners
D4N14L
approved these changes
Apr 24, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes a regression in which commands would sometimes not execute all operations on which they depended if not all phases were explicitly specified in the command definition.
Details
The runtime distinguishes the exact set of phases defined in command-line.json from the expanded set that includes all dependencies of those phases. For commands where these two sets differed, if
--include-phase-depswas not specified, phases that were not explicitly listed were being omitted.How it was tested
Updated the unit tests for PhasedOperationPlugin
Impacted documentation
Making this work as expected.