Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump: [#4684] Upgrade filenamify using import-sync for esm-only package #4782

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 1, 2024

Conversation

ceciliaavila
Copy link
Collaborator

Addresses #4684
#minor

Description

This PR updates the filenamify package to its latest version 6.0.0. Starting on version 5.x, this package is ESM-only, so we used import-sync to be able to use this version.

Specific Changes

  • Updated filenamify from 4.3.0 and 6.0.0 in botbuilder library.
  • Added import-sync as a dependency in botbuilder.
  • Added filenamify to the depcheck ignore list as it threw a false positive on unused dependency.
  • Updated the fileTranscriptStore class to import the package filenamify using the importSync function.

Testing

The following images show the installed version and the unit tests passing after the changes.
image

@ceciliaavila ceciliaavila requested a review from a team as a code owner November 1, 2024 12:05
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 1, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11629057880

Details

  • 2 of 2 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.001%) to 84.704%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 11618514189: 0.001%
Covered Lines: 20515
Relevant Lines: 23064

💛 - Coveralls

@tracyboehrer tracyboehrer merged commit 38e4678 into main Nov 1, 2024
13 checks passed
@tracyboehrer tracyboehrer deleted the southworks/update/esm-only-filenamify branch November 1, 2024 12:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants