Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

389-ds-base: init at v3.1.0 #10572

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

389-ds-base: init at v3.1.0 #10572

merged 6 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

mfrw
Copy link
Member

@mfrw mfrw commented Sep 27, 2024

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?
Add 389-ds-base package.
For WorkItem: 389-ds-base

Change Log
  • Add 389-ds-base
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues
Links to CVEs
  • NA
Test Methodology

Note: The build and tests pass but the build shows failed as two other packages have a failing ptest. python-argcomplete & python-argparse-manpage

@mfrw mfrw added specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED 3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 labels Sep 27, 2024
Copy link
Member Author

@mfrw mfrw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mfrw mfrw marked this pull request as ready for review September 27, 2024 06:44
@mfrw mfrw requested a review from a team as a code owner September 27, 2024 06:44
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member Author

@mfrw mfrw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@xordux
Verified installation of the package:
image

@mfrw mfrw merged commit 6e6c860 into 3.0-dev Sep 27, 2024
12 checks passed
@mfrw mfrw deleted the mfrw/389-ds-base branch September 27, 2024 10:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 Packaging specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants