Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Convert WDL files to v1.0 #262

Closed
mflynn-lanl opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #310
Closed

Convert WDL files to v1.0 #262

mflynn-lanl opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #310
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mflynn-lanl
Copy link
Collaborator

mflynn-lanl commented Jul 18, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We need to switch to v1.0 for our WDL's to match what's used for the NMDC

Describe the solution you'd like
Convert each of the nmdc-edge WDL's to v1.0

Additional context
Both the individual WDL's need to be converted as well as the metaG pipeline template file metagenome_pipeline_wdl.tmpl

This is related to a FY24 Q4 milestone. Target due date for this task is end of August, quarter ends end of Sept.

@aclum
Copy link

aclum commented Jul 23, 2024

Adding to this sprint since @vlilanl is working on it.

@ssarrafan
Copy link

@vlilanl said this is in progress but won't be done today. Moving to next sprint. FYI @aclum

@ssarrafan
Copy link

@vlilanl @aclum @mflynn-lanl what's the status of this. Hasn't been updated for 2 weeks.

@ssarrafan
Copy link

Valerie will add to the sprint if she has time to work on this per Slack message with her today. @vlilanl

@vlilanl vlilanl linked a pull request Oct 4, 2024 that will close this issue
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🆕 New to ✅ Done in EDGE Board Oct 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants