Skip to content

Support function capture parameters#287

Merged
mgomes merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
codex/issue-270-rest-block-params
Jun 18, 2026
Merged

Support function capture parameters#287
mgomes merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
codex/issue-270-rest-block-params

Conversation

@mgomes

@mgomes mgomes commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Vibescript presents Ruby-like function definitions, so definition-side capture parameters should have coherent parser and runtime behavior instead of generic parse failures. This adds explicit support for rest positional, keyword rest, and block capture parameters with scoped ordering and default rules.

Closes #270

@mgomes

mgomes commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

1 similar comment
@mgomes

mgomes commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Chef's kiss.

Reviewed commit: 2618a9b36d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@mgomes mgomes merged commit 8a4a52c into master Jun 18, 2026
8 checks passed
@mgomes mgomes deleted the codex/issue-270-rest-block-params branch June 18, 2026 06:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ruby-style rest parameters and block capture do not parse

1 participant