📖 update OpenSSF CII Best Practices badge #868
Conversation
OpenSSF CII Best Practices badge is expected to be repository specific. Our old badge is organization-wide, and does not quality for points in OpenSSF Scorecard for example. I've done the CII analysis for IPAM alone, and we have received a passing badge for IPAM now. Signed-off-by: Tuomo Tanskanen <[email protected]>
metal3-io-bot
added
the
size/XS
|
/override metal3-centos-e2e-integration-test-main metal3-ubuntu-e2e-integration-test-main |
|
@tuminoid: Overrode contexts on behalf of tuminoid: metal3-centos-e2e-integration-test-main, metal3-ubuntu-e2e-integration-test-main In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: lentzi90 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
metal3-io-bot
added
the
approved
|
/lgtm |
OpenSSF CII Best Practices badge is expected to be repository specific. Our old badge is organization-wide, and does not quality for points in OpenSSF Scorecard for example.
I've done the CII analysis for IPAM alone, and we have received a passing badge for IPAM now.
IPAM evaluation can be found in bestpractices.net