-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade meshery-operator
#487
Conversation
@@ -110,7 +110,9 @@ var _ = Describe("The test case for the meshsync CRDs", func() { | |||
}, | |||
} | |||
By("Update the status of the meshsync CRDs") | |||
err := fakeClient.Status().Update(context, meshSync, &client.UpdateOptions{FieldManager: FileManager}) | |||
err := fakeClient.Status().Update(context, meshSync, &client.SubResourceUpdateOptions{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, @acald-creator thanks for your contribution. Please check the CI issue first. I consider the test case "The meshsync CRDs update the status of the resources" is useful, I mean do we need to check the status?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Aisuko I saw the CI issue, I will check to see if I can get this resolved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Outside of the failing test... 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (other than the failing test)
bump, still working on this |
Good, good. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Checking in... it has been awhile since we've heard from you on this issue. Are you still working on it? Please let us know and please don't hesitate to contact a MeshMate or any other community member for assistance.
|
@acald-creator @nebula-aac it'd be good to have this finished off |
Update README.md
2a5e88c
to
b76649e
Compare
Signed-off-by: Antonette Caldwell <[email protected]>
d11b6c1
to
7a11975
Compare
@leecalcote working on it, but still trying to get the test case to past locally, it runs fine |
merge conflict |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Signed-off-by: Antonette Caldwell <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Antonette Caldwell <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Antonette Caldwell <[email protected]>
This already done by #536 , So, we close this one. |
Description
This PR updates
meshery-operator
to use the latestcontroller-runtime
atv0.15.0
, which usesk8s.io
v0.27
.This also updates the test to utilize
&client.SubResourceUpdateOptions{}
instead of&client.UpdateOptions{}
as this is wrapped in&client.SubResourceUpdateOptions{}
Notes for Reviewers
Signed commits