Add multi-track advanced example#127
Closed
mattfsourcecode wants to merge 1 commit intomdn:mainfrom
mattfsourcecode:add-multi-track-advanced-example
Closed
Add multi-track advanced example#127mattfsourcecode wants to merge 1 commit intomdn:mainfrom mattfsourcecode:add-multi-track-advanced-example
mattfsourcecode wants to merge 1 commit intomdn:mainfrom
mattfsourcecode:add-multi-track-advanced-example
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
I’m unable to continue contributing to this project at this time, so I’ll be closing this PR. Thanks for reviewing and for the opportunity to share this work. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR introduces a new example,
multi-track-advanced, to extend the existing multi-track example.It adds new features that provide greater control over audio playback:
Additional Details
This PR provides a working demo intended to facilitate discussion around functionality, styling, and syntax for the new example before merging.
It follows up on an issue that was previously closed due to inactivity: #45
(Relates to: #45)
I look forward to all feedback and requests for improvement!