Skip to content

Conversation

@Adam-Clrk
Copy link

@Adam-Clrk Adam-Clrk commented Jun 23, 2018

use of safeEval is considered a vulnerability

https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/337

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 23, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #71 into master will decrease coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #71      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage   92.42%   92.3%   -0.12%     
=========================================
  Files           2       2              
  Lines          66      65       -1     
=========================================
- Hits           61      60       -1     
  Misses          5       5
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
index.js 90% <100%> (-0.2%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 777d7db...fd2d322. Read the comment docs.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 23, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+1.4%) to 92.308% when pulling fd2d322 on Adam-Clrk:master into 777d7db on matheuss:master.

Copy link

@alexis89x alexis89x left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Jumped to the same conclusion after being warned bu GitHub that SafeEval is not secure.

Copy link

@vorwieger vorwieger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes are done well.

Copy link

@Norway174 Norway174 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested it. And it works! Please approve of this.

Copy link

@wadie wadie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe someone should create a fork of this and keep it updated ?

@vitalets
Copy link

Maybe someone should create a fork of this and keep it updated ?

Done in vitalets#2.

Copy link

@ArtanisTheOne ArtanisTheOne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.