Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dataCorrections.js #951

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 11, 2025
Merged

Update dataCorrections.js #951

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 11, 2025

Conversation

rhanka
Copy link
Member

@rhanka rhanka commented Mar 11, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced the data correction tool by adding a new configuration option for handling removal requests, which improves overall data management and privacy controls.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 11, 2025

Walkthrough

A new entry has been added to the dataCorrections object in the src/components/tools/dataCorrections.js file. The entry, identified by the key "LibqfPint-0f", includes fields such as permalink, change, request, reason, proofs, and anonymize with predefined values. This update expands the dataset to support an additional case for data correction without altering any control flow.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/.../dataCorrections.js Added new "LibqfPint-0f" entry with properties: permalink ("/id/LibqfPint-0f"), change ("remove"), request ("child"), reason ("cnil-art-85"), proofs (["none"]), and anonymize (true).

Possibly related PRs

  • Art 85 #921: Involves adding new entries to the dataCorrections object with similar properties for child-related requests.
  • Article 85 #928: Introduces similar modifications to handle child data correction entries in the same file.
  • anonymize all data in "remove" case #936: Refines the handling of "remove" type data corrections, aligning closely with the current update.

Poem

I'm a coding rabbit with a joyful hop,
Leaping through data where new entries crop,
"LibqfPint-0f" now joins the line,
Corrections in place, looking mighty fine,
With each small change, I bounce with glee,
Carrots and code set my spirit free,
Hopping onward in our digital spree! 🐰

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/tools/dataCorrections.js (1)

1-227: Consider fixing inconsistent property names in existing entries.

While not related to the current change, I noticed that some existing entries (e.g., lines 25 and 33) use "anonymyze" (with a typo) instead of "anonymize" as seen in most entries including the new one. Consider standardizing this property name in a future PR.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0d404f1 and 76ecb05.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/tools/dataCorrections.js (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Pull request test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/tools/dataCorrections.js (1)

219-226: LGTM - Entry added correctly.

The new entry follows the consistent format and structure of existing entries, with appropriate values for all fields.

@rhanka rhanka merged commit 0c67552 into dev Mar 11, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant