-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 858
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adds Dense SIFT feature type. http://www.vlfeat.org/overview/dsift.html #236
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hi,
vl/dsift.h is already present in opensfm/src/third_party/vlfeat/vl/dsift.h
They are not part of this pull req.
…-sashi.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Russ ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In opensfm/src/dsift.cc
<#236 (comment)>:
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+#include "types.h"
+#include "dsift.h"
+
+#include <vector>
+#include <iostream>
+
+extern "C" {
+ #include "vl/dsift.h"
Are these files included in the pull req?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#236 (review)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Af6yBm19FiMlzHaRQAvhcVcqlfAf-KCaks5tqqnqgaJpZM4QVw9n>
.
|
Hi @sashichandra, sorry I deleted my comment after I found the file. |
Is there a chance you could resolve the conflict in the features.py file @sashichandra ? @paulinus are you willing to merge this? Otherwise I'll pull this into my own working copy. |
@russkel, I've resolved the conflicts on this branch and put the result in this branch https://github.com/paulinus/OpenSfM/tree/sashichandra-dsift About merging it to master, the main concern is that Dense SIFT is not a suitable feature for SfM in general. The reason for that is that it extracts features on a fixed grid that is not adapted to the actual image texture. As a result, corresponding features in different images are not centered around the same real-world point. This adds substantial error to triangulation and resection algorithms to the point where they no longer work. Testing this branch on berlin and lund dataset, I was unable to get good reconstructions. Only berlin yield a reasonable reconstruction after setting If there is a trick to make things work better, please let me know. |
Hi @sashichandra! Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks! |
No description provided.