feat: issue empty state #5998
feat: issue empty state #5998
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing type definitions and component structures related to project issues. A new type Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
gakshita
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/types/src/ai.d.ts (1)
11-15: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments.The
TProjectPlannerInputtype is well-structured and follows TypeScript naming conventions.Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose of this type and its fields:
+/** + * Input type for AI-powered project planning functionality + */ export type TProjectPlannerInput = { + /** The input data/prompt for the AI planner */ data: string; + /** The ID of the workspace containing the project */ workspace_id: string; + /** The ID of the project being planned */ project_id: string; };web/ce/components/issues/issue-layouts/empty-states/project-issues.tsx (2)
8-15: Consider improving type safety for callback propsThe type definition is clear, but could be enhanced:
setTrackElementcould use a union type of specific tracking elements instead of generic stringtoggleCreateIssueModalcould have its parameters typed more strictlyConsider this improvement:
type TProps = { issueFilterCount: number; additionalPath?: string; handleClearAllFilters: () => void; - toggleCreateIssueModal: (value?: boolean | undefined, storeType?: TCreateModalStoreTypes | undefined) => void; - setTrackElement: (element: string) => void; + toggleCreateIssueModal: (value: boolean, storeType: TCreateModalStoreTypes) => void; + setTrackElement: (element: "Project issue empty state") => void; emptyStateType?: EmptyStateType; };
34-38: Extract tracking constant for better maintainabilityThe tracking element string "Project issue empty state" is hardcoded. Consider extracting it to a constants file for better maintainability and reusability.
+ // In a constants file + export const TRACKING_ELEMENTS = { + PROJECT_EMPTY_STATE: "Project issue empty state" + } as const; // In the component - setTrackElement("Project issue empty state"); + setTrackElement(TRACKING_ELEMENTS.PROJECT_EMPTY_STATE);web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/empty-states/project-issues.tsx (1)
43-43: Consider a more descriptive variable nameThe variable
additionalPathcould be renamed to better reflect its purpose, such asactiveLayoutPathorfilterLayoutPath.- const additionalPath = issueFilterCount > 0 ? (activeLayout ?? "list") : undefined; + const activeLayoutPath = issueFilterCount > 0 ? (activeLayout ?? "list") : undefined;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
packages/types/src/ai.d.ts(1 hunks)web/ce/components/issues/index.ts(1 hunks)web/ce/components/issues/issue-layouts/empty-states/index.ts(1 hunks)web/ce/components/issues/issue-layouts/empty-states/project-issues.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/empty-states/project-issues.tsx(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- web/ce/components/issues/issue-layouts/empty-states/index.ts
🔇 Additional comments (7)
web/ce/components/issues/index.ts (2)
7-7: LGTM! Export statement follows consistent pattern
The new export statement follows the established pattern and properly exposes the empty states functionality, aligning with the PR's objective.
7-7: Verify the empty states module structure
Let's verify the existence of the empty states module and its usage in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Empty states module structure is valid and well-organized
The empty states module exists and is properly structured:
- Has a clean index.ts that re-exports from project-issues
- Contains a well-implemented ResolvedProjectEmptyState component
- Properly imports and uses the EmptyState component from shared components
- Has correct type definitions and follows the project's patterns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the empty states module structure and its usage
# Check if the empty states module exists
echo "Checking for empty states module..."
fd "empty-states.{ts,tsx}" "web/ce/components/issues"
# Find references to empty states components
echo "Checking usage of empty states components..."
rg -t typescript -t typescriptreact "EmptyState|empty-states" "web/ce"
Length of output: 661
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the empty states module
# Check if the directory exists and list its contents
echo "Checking directory structure..."
ls -la web/ce/components/issues/issue-layouts/empty-states
# Find any files with "empty" in their name
echo "Finding empty state related files..."
fd -t f "empty" web/ce/components/issues
# Search for imports or usage of empty states
echo "Checking for empty states usage..."
rg "empty-states" web/ce
Length of output: 678
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the contents of the empty-states files and their usage
# Check the content of empty-states/index.ts
echo "Content of empty-states/index.ts:"
cat web/ce/components/issues/issue-layouts/empty-states/index.ts
# Check the content of project-issues.tsx
echo -e "\nContent of project-issues.tsx:"
cat web/ce/components/issues/issue-layouts/empty-states/project-issues.tsx
# Find where project-issues component is being used
echo -e "\nUsage of project-issues component:"
rg -l "ProjectIssuesEmptyState" web/ce
Length of output: 1844
packages/types/src/ai.d.ts (1)
11-15: Verify consistency with existing ID field naming patterns.
Let's verify if the field naming (workspace_id and project_id) follows the same pattern as used in other types like IGptResponse.
✅ Verification successful
ID field naming follows consistent snake_case pattern across the codebase
The verification shows that all instances of workspace_id and project_id fields in type definitions consistently use snake_case throughout the codebase, including in related types like:
TProjectPlannerInput- Issue-related types
- Workspace-related types
- Project-related types
- User-related types
The current implementation in packages/types/src/ai.d.ts correctly follows this established pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the naming patterns of ID fields across the codebase
# Expected: Consistent use of either snake_case or camelCase for ID fields
# Search for ID field declarations in type definitions
rg -t typescript "(?:workspace|project)[-_]?id\??:\s*string" --type-add "typescript:*.{ts,tsx,d.ts}"
Length of output: 2141
web/ce/components/issues/issue-layouts/empty-states/project-issues.tsx (2)
1-6: LGTM! Well-organized imports
The imports are properly organized into logical groups (mobx, components, constants) and all imports are utilized in the component.
26-41: Consider optimizing the component structure
The div wrapper with overflow-y-auto might be redundant if the EmptyState component already handles scrolling internally.
If EmptyState doesn't handle scrolling internally, consider moving the scrolling logic to a layout component:
- <div className="relative h-full w-full overflow-y-auto">
+ <div className="relative h-full w-full">web/core/components/issues/issue-layouts/empty-states/project-issues.tsx (2)
11-12: LGTM! Clean import organization
The import statement follows good practices with clear sectioning and proper component naming.
47-53: Verify ResolvedProjectEmptyState contract and optimize prop passing
The component usage looks clean, but let's verify two aspects:
Additionally, consider simplifying the emptyStateType prop:
- emptyStateType={issueFilterCount > 0 ? EmptyStateType.PROJECT_EMPTY_FILTER : undefined}
+ emptyStateType={issueFilterCount > 0 && EmptyStateType.PROJECT_EMPTY_FILTER}✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Props usage aligns with component contract, optimization suggestion withdrawn
The component usage is correct as all required props are being passed according to the component's type definition found in web/ce/components/issues/issue-layouts/empty-states/project-issues.tsx. The emptyStateType is correctly marked as optional with ? in the type definition, so the current conditional rendering approach is actually the proper way to handle it. I withdraw the optimization suggestion as the current implementation is more explicit about the intent.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ResolvedProjectEmptyState component contract and usage
# Search for the component definition to verify required props
ast-grep --pattern 'type TProps = {
$$$
}'
# Search for other usages of the component to ensure consistency
rg -A 5 'ResolvedProjectEmptyState'
Length of output: 4835
Summary
This PR Implements issue empty state from CE folder
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
TProjectPlannerInputfor structured project planning input.ResolvedProjectEmptyStateto enhance handling of empty states in project issues.Improvements
ProjectEmptyStatecomponent for better prop management and clarity.Bug Fixes