fix: issue and module link validation #5994
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on enhancing error handling and URL processing within various components related to link operations. Modifications include the introduction of error re-throwing in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail-widgets/links/helper.tsx (3)
30-30: Consider adding proper error typing.While re-throwing the error is a good practice for error propagation, consider defining a proper error type instead of using
any.- } catch (error: any) { + } catch (error: Error | { data: { error: string } }) {
Line range hint
42-49: Maintain consistent error handling with create method.The error handling in the update method differs from the create method in two ways:
- No type annotation for the error
- Not utilizing error details in the toast message
- } catch (error) { + } catch (error: Error | { data: { error: string } }) { setToast({ - message: "The link could not be updated", + message: error?.data?.error ?? "The link could not be updated", type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, title: "Link not updated", });
Line range hint
52-65: Maintain consistent error propagation across all methods.The
removemethod handles errors differently fromcreateandupdateby not re-throwing the error. Consider maintaining a consistent error propagation strategy across all methods.} catch (error) { setToast({ message: "The link could not be removed", type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, title: "Link not removed", }); + throw error; }web/core/components/modules/links/create-update-modal.tsx (1)
Line range hint
46-65: Improve error handling robustnessThe current error handling could be enhanced for better debugging and user experience:
- Using
anytype for errors loses type safety- The error structure assumption might miss some cases
- Generic error message provides limited debugging context
Consider this improved implementation:
- } catch (error: any) { + } catch (error) { + const errorMessage = error instanceof Error + ? error.message + : error?.data?.error ?? "Failed to process the link. Please check the URL and try again."; + console.error("Link operation failed:", error); setToast({ type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, title: "Error!", - message: error?.data?.error ?? "Some error occurred. Please try again.", + message: errorMessage, }); }web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/links/create-update-link-modal.tsx (1)
55-56: Simplify conditional logicThe condition
!formData || !formData.idcan be simplified to just!formData.idsince formData will always be defined here due to React Hook Form.-if (!formData || !formData.id) await linkOperations.create({ title: formData.title, url: parsedUrl }); +if (!formData.id) await linkOperations.create({ title: formData.title, url: parsedUrl });web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/links/root.tsx (1)
Line range hint
84-99: Maintain consistent error handling across operations.The
removeoperation's error handling differs fromcreateandupdate. Consider adding error re-throwing here as well for consistency.Apply this diff:
remove: async (linkId: string) => { try { if (!workspaceSlug || !projectId || !issueId) throw new Error("Missing required fields"); await removeLink(workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId, linkId); setToast({ message: "The link has been successfully removed", type: TOAST_TYPE.SUCCESS, title: "Link removed", }); toggleIssueLinkModal(false); } catch (error) { setToast({ message: "The link could not be removed", type: TOAST_TYPE.ERROR, title: "Link not removed", }); + throw error; } },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail-widgets/links/helper.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/links/create-update-link-modal.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/links/root.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/components/modules/links/create-update-modal.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail-widgets/links/helper.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-70: Verify URL validation removal and protocol prepending implementation.
The PR objectives mention removing URL validation and adding protocol prepending, but these changes are not visible in this file. Let's verify where these changes are implemented.
web/core/components/modules/links/create-update-modal.tsx (2)
Line range hint 89-95: LGTM: Validation changes align with PR objectives
The simplified validation approach, keeping only the required field check while removing URL format validation, aligns with the PR objectives. The optional title field is handled appropriately.
40-40: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance URL protocol handling for better security and UX
The current URL processing has potential security and user experience concerns:
- It doesn't differentiate between
http://andhttps:// - Users might expect secure connections by default
- The removal of frontend validation puts more responsibility on the backend
Consider this improved implementation:
-const parsedUrl = formData.url.startsWith("http") ? formData.url : `http://${formData.url}`;
+const parsedUrl = formData.url.startsWith("http://") || formData.url.startsWith("https://")
+ ? formData.url
+ : `https://${formData.url}`;Let's verify the backend validation:
Also applies to: 43-43
✅ Verification successful
Backend URL validation is properly implemented
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if backend has proper URL validation
# Look for URL validation patterns in API routes and models
# Search for URL validation in backend files
rg -t py -t ts "url.*valid|valid.*url"
# Search for URL-related models and schemas
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
url: $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 3261
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/links/root.tsx (2)
61-61: LGTM! Error propagation enhancement.
The addition of error re-throwing after toast notifications improves error handling by allowing upstream components to catch and handle these errors appropriately.
Also applies to: 80-80
Line range hint 1-134: Verify URL validation changes across the codebase.
The PR objectives mention removal of URL validation from frontend, but this file doesn't show those changes. Let's verify where the URL validation was removed from.
✅ Verification successful
URL validation has been simplified as intended
The code changes show URL validation was successfully simplified from a complex validation function to a basic HTTP prefix check, aligning with the PR objective of removing extensive frontend URL validation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for URL validation related code and changes
# Look for URL validation patterns in the codebase
echo "Searching for URL validation patterns..."
rg -i "url.*valid|valid.*url" --type tsx --type ts
# Look for URL-related changes in the PR
echo "Searching for URL-related changes in recent commits..."
git log -p | rg -i "url.*valid|valid.*url"
Length of output: 290033
| try { | ||
| if (!formData || !formData.id) await linkOperations.create({ title: formData.title, url: parsedUrl }); | ||
| else await linkOperations.update(formData.id, { title: formData.title, url: parsedUrl }); | ||
| onClose(); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error("error", error); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling and user feedback
The current implementation silently fails by only logging to console. Users should be notified when operations fail.
try {
if (!formData || !formData.id) await linkOperations.create({ title: formData.title, url: parsedUrl });
else await linkOperations.update(formData.id, { title: formData.title, url: parsedUrl });
onClose();
} catch (error) {
- console.error("error", error);
+ console.error("Failed to save link:", error);
+ // Assuming you have a toast notification system
+ toast.error(
+ error instanceof Error
+ ? error.message
+ : "Failed to save link. Please try again."
+ );
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| if (!formData || !formData.id) await linkOperations.create({ title: formData.title, url: formData.url }); | ||
| else await linkOperations.update(formData.id as string, { title: formData.title, url: formData.url }); | ||
| onClose(); | ||
| const parsedUrl = formData.url.startsWith("http") ? formData.url : `http://${formData.url}`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance URL protocol validation logic
The current URL processing might miss some edge cases. Consider using the URL constructor for robust URL validation and protocol handling.
-const parsedUrl = formData.url.startsWith("http") ? formData.url : `http://${formData.url}`;
+const getValidUrl = (url: string) => {
+ try {
+ const urlObject = new URL(url);
+ return urlObject.toString();
+ } catch {
+ // If URL is invalid or missing protocol, prepend https:// (preferred over http://)
+ return `https://${url}`;
+ }
+};
+const parsedUrl = getValidUrl(formData.url);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const parsedUrl = formData.url.startsWith("http") ? formData.url : `http://${formData.url}`; | |
| const getValidUrl = (url: string) => { | |
| try { | |
| const urlObject = new URL(url); | |
| return urlObject.toString(); | |
| } catch { | |
| // If URL is invalid or missing protocol, prepend https:// (preferred over http://) | |
| return `https://${url}`; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| const parsedUrl = getValidUrl(formData.url); |
Bug fix:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation