.NET examples for Email section

[dr-3lo]

• Corrected examples of the .NET API client in the email section
• Made a small update to the Java part to ensure consistent naming of YOUR_ACCOUNT_ID
• Fixed a small issue in the PHP example where accountId was missing

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated API client initialization to use a factory-based creation pattern.
  • Revised examples across all languages to use account-scoped resource access (YOUR_ACCOUNT_ID) and consistent method chaining.
  • Updated sample request shapes and parameter names for domains, templates, and suppressions; improved null-safety and formatting.
  • Enhanced sample output/logging for template and domain operations.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Replaced direct client instantiation with a MailtrapClientFactory-based flow and migrated all resource access to account-scoped calls (client.Account(YOUR_ACCOUNT_ID)...). Standardized request object constructions and parameter placeholders across language samples and applied minor null-safety/formatting tweaks.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)

Summary

OpenAPI spec & examples specs/email-api.openapi.yml

Switched examples to MailtrapClientFactory("YOUR_API_KEY") → CreateClient(); changed resource access to client.Account(YOUR_ACCOUNT_ID)... for SendingDomains, EmailTemplates, Suppressions, etc.; updated request object shapes/constructors (e.g., CreateSendingDomainRequest, CreateEmailTemplateRequest, SendingDomainInstructionsRequest); replaced ACCOUNT_ID/accountId with YOUR_ACCOUNT_ID; added null-safe prints/formatting and consistent parameter ordering across C#, Java, Python, Ruby, PHP, Shell samples.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title '.NET examples for Email section' accurately describes the main change — correcting and updating .NET API client examples in the email section with factory-based client creation and account-scoped access patterns.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c650da8 and a80c204.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• specs/email-api.openapi.yml

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a0da6c and d0df2ae.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• specs/email-api.openapi.yml

🔇 Additional comments (11)

specs/email-api.openapi.yml (11)

119-130: LGTM! Good refactoring to factory pattern.

The changes improve the .NET code example by:

• Using the factory pattern for client creation
• Extracting the request object to a variable for clarity
• Using defensive null-safe navigation on the output
• Standardizing to YOUR_ACCOUNT_ID placeholder

---

269-279: LGTM! Consistent factory pattern usage.

The changes align with the factory pattern introduced in other .NET examples.

---

388-395: LGTM! Consistent implementation.

---

502-509: LGTM! Consistent implementation.

---

804-822: LGTM! Consistent factory pattern usage.

---

945-953: LGTM! Consistent implementation.

---

1033-1039: LGTM! Good addition of output demonstration.

The changes consistently apply the factory pattern and enhance the example by showing how to iterate and display template details.

---

151-151: LGTM! Good consistency fix across Java examples.

The changes standardize placeholder naming from ACCOUNT_ID to YOUR_ACCOUNT_ID across all Java code samples, improving consistency with examples in other languages.

Also applies to: 294-294, 411-411, 525-525, 664-664, 838-838, 842-842, 969-969

---

1092-1092: LGTM! Fixes missing accountId parameter.

This change addresses the issue mentioned in the PR description where the PHP example was missing the accountId variable, making it consistent with other PHP examples in the file.

---

1105-1105: LGTM! Adds missing account_id parameter.

This change makes the Python email template example consistent with other Python examples throughout the file (e.g., lines 96, 242, 360, 476, 598, 767, 918) by including the required account_id parameter.

---

1132-1145: Verify the CreateEmailTemplateRequest constructor signature against the official .NET SDK.

The code example uses CreateEmailTemplateRequest with parameters in the order: Name, Category, Subject. Confirm this matches the actual Mailtrap .NET SDK API signature, as any mismatch will cause compilation errors for users copying this example.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

specs/email-api.openapi.yml (1)

632-639: Previous review comment addressed successfully.

The unused GetDetails() call has been correctly removed, addressing the feedback from the previous review. The example now proceeds directly to SendInstructions() without the unnecessary API call.

Optional: Remove blank line for cleaner formatting

 var domainId = 12345;
 var domainResource = client.Account(YOUR_ACCOUNT_ID).SendingDomain(domainId);
-
 var request = new SendingDomainInstructionsRequest("[email protected]");

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0df2ae and c650da8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• specs/email-api.openapi.yml

🔇 Additional comments (4)

specs/email-api.openapi.yml (4)

1091-1091: Good fixes for missing account identifiers.

Line 1091 correctly adds the missing $accountId variable definition for the PHP example, and line 1104 adds the missing account_id parameter for the Python client instantiation. These fixes ensure the examples are complete and functional.

Also applies to: 1104-1104

---

123-124: Excellent consistency in .NET client factory pattern.

All .NET code samples have been uniformly updated to use the MailtrapClientFactory pattern with account-scoped resource access (client.Account(YOUR_ACCOUNT_ID).XYZ()). This provides a consistent developer experience across all examples and aligns with the stated PR objectives.

Also applies to: 269-270, 388-389, 502-503, 632-633, 803-804, 944-945, 1032-1034, 1133-1134

---

151-151: Consistent placeholder naming in Java examples.

The Java examples now consistently use YOUR_ACCOUNT_ID as the placeholder name instead of mixed variations. This improves clarity and consistency across the documentation.

Also applies to: 294-294, 411-411, 525-525, 663-663, 837-837, 841-841, 968-968

---

120-120: The necessity of this using directive cannot be determined without examining the Mailtrap .NET client library source code.

The using Mailtrap.SendingDomains; directive may be required for type resolution. While CreateSendingDomainRequest is explicitly imported from Mailtrap.SendingDomains.Requests, the response object from domainsResource.Create() likely has a type from the Mailtrap.SendingDomains namespace (such as SendingDomain). Without access to the actual library implementation, verify by checking:

• The return type of the SendingDomains() method
• The return type of the Create() method
• Whether any extension methods from that namespace are being used implicitly